Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.martha Chappell, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Mayo Clinic, Defendant--appellee, 131 F.3d 143 (8th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Before BOWMAN, MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and CONMY,1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Martha Chappell sued the Mayo Clinic for breach of its duty of care to keep its premises in a reasonably safe condition. She alleged she suffered injury from a fall in the clinic cafeteria when her shoe stuck on a sticky substance and appeals from the summary judgment granted by the district court2 in favor of the Mayo Clinic. Based on our review of the record, we affirm the judgment on the basis of the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
