Glen Lockerby, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas Dugal, Deputy County Attorney; Kathi Mayer, Deputycounty Attorney; Sandra Hansen, Deputy County Attorney;cynthia Coleman, Officer and Agent of the Pima Countysheriff's Department; Pan Treadwell-rubin, Deputy Countyattorney; Jane Williams, Pima County Through Pima Countyboard of Supervisors; Sheriff Dupnik, Pima County Sheriff'sdepartment; Stephen Neely, Pima County Attorney,defendants-appellees, 129 F.3d 126 (9th Cir. 1997)

MEMORANDUM^* 

Glenn Lockerby appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in Lockerby's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants conducted an improper criminal investigation resulting in an indictment and prosecution for child molestation, sexual abuse of a minor, and indecent exposure. The district court found that Lockerby's action was barred by res judicata and Arizona's two-year statute of limitations. The district court also found that defendant Dugal was entitled to absolute immunity. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Roe v. City & County of San Francisco, 109 F.3d 578, 583 (9th Cir. 1997), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order entered on October 16, 1996.

AFFIRMED.