Arthur Parris, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Lakewood; James Clancy; John Vega, Defendants-appellees, 122 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 1999)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-94-08689-DT; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: SCHROEDER, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Arthur Parris appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the defendants in his action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. and California contract law, alleging that the defendants terminated him because he is African-American. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir. 1989), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on June 17, 1996.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, Parris's request for oral argument is denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
