Daniel Marion Schroyer, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Doctor Kiczaleas; William A. Scott; John T. Gavlas,defendants-appellees, 12 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 12 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted Oct. 25, 1993. Decided Nov. 19, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke, No. CA-92-706-R; James H. Michael, Jr., District Judge.

Daniel Marion Schroyer, pro se.

Barbara J. Taylor, Parvin, Wilson, Barnett & Guynn, Powell M. Leitch, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, VA, James Walter Hopper, Richmond, VA, for defendants-appellees.

W.D. Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting Dr. Kiczaleas' motion for summary judgment, denying Appellant's jury trial demand, and denying leave to amend the complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.