United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ronald Olen Burrows, Defendant-appellant, 119 F.3d 7 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore HUG, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Ronald O. Burrows appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial on the basis of "newly discovered" evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, see United States v. Kulczyk, 931 F.2d 542, 548 (9th Cir. 1991), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on September 10, 1996.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4. The government's motion to strike and Burrows's request for oral argument are denied. Burrows's motion to file a replacement brief is granted
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
