United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alfredo Camacho-nuno, Defendant-appellant, 112 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 112 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted April 21, 1997. *Decided April 24, 1997

Before BROWNING, THOMPSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Alfredo Camacho-Nuno appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1). He contends that his conviction should be vacated because he did not personally "use" a firearm as defined in Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), and he cannot be held responsible for the acts of codefendant Jose Gonzales-Amescua. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed May 10, 1996. See United States v. Lopez, 100 F.3d 98, 101 (9th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.