Lorenzo Rivera-medina, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent, 110 F.3d 69 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CasePetition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, No. A35-470-597.
BIA
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Before: NOONAN, THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and HAGEN,** District Judge.
ORDER***
This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the authority of Duldulao v. INS, --- F.3d ----, 1996 WL 411447 (9th Cir.), 96 Cal.Daily Op.Serv. 5453.
HAGEN, District Judge, concurring:
I concur in the result because Duldulao is circuit precedent ostensibly holding this court has no jurisdiction to review any deportation order against aliens convicted of certain crimes, even where the claim sub judice, as here, raises a constitutional question. But for Duldulao, I believe petitioner's constitutional claim should have been explored and a determination made whether it is barred by Sammaniego-Meraz v. INS, 53 F.3d 245 (9th Cir. 1995).
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
Honorable David W. Hagen, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of thus circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
