George D. Gilbert, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of Oregon; Oregon Department of Corrections; Frankhall, Defendants-appellees, 110 F.3d 68 (9th Cir. 1997)

MEMORANDUM^** 

Oregon state prisoner George D. Gilbert appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Gilbert alleged that defendants violated a settlement agreement previously entered between the parties governing the provision of kosher meals to Gilbert. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

We affirm the district court's summary judgment for defendants on Gilbert's claims regarding his kosher diet for the reasons stated by the district court in its March 5, 1996 opinion.

Because Gilbert has failed to present any facts or legal argument regarding summary judgment on the remainder of his claims, the claims are deemed abandoned. See Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (holding, in pro se appeal, that claims not supported by argument are deemed abandoned unless failure to consider them would result in manifest injustice).

AFFIRMED.