Patrick Louis Byrd, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Karen Humiston; John Hallahan; Major Brannom; Mc Moss;b. Leon; Cso Hoke; Cpo Otero; Don Schiavo;samuel Lewis, Defendants-appellees, 110 F.3d 67 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 110 F.3d 67 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted March 24, 1997. *Decided March 26, 1997

Before: SNEED, FARRIS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Arizona state prisoner Patrick Louis Byrd appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Byrd's action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. See Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir. 1989).

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order entered on July 3, 1996.

AFFIRMED.1 

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Because of our disposition of this appeal, we do not consider the applicability, if any, of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), to this appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.