Richard Vincent Mayes, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Susan L. Hubbard, Associate Warden, Defendant-appellee, 108 F.3d 1385 (9th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 108 F.3d 1385 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted March 11, 1997. *Decided March 14, 1997

Before: SNEED, LEAVY and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

California state prisoner Richard Vincent Mayes appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We agree with the district court that Mayes has not established that prison officials violated his constitutional rights. The district court did not err by failing to appoint counsel for Mayes. We decline to consider Mayes's claim of false imprisonment, raised for the first time on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.