United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Brian D. Carey, Aka: Brian Carey, Aka: Douglas Briancarey, Aka: Douglas B. Carey, Defendant-appellant, 106 F.3d 409 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Brian D. Carey appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 2255 motion seeking to vacate his 1971 federal conviction for making false statements. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.
We review de novo questions of the district court's jurisdiction. See United States v. Matta-Ballesteros, 71 F.3d 754, 762 (9th Cir. 1995).
The district court correctly dismissed Carey's section 2255 motion for lack of jurisdiction because Carey had completed his sentence and was not in custody at the time he filed his motion for relief. See Hirabayashi v. United States, 828 F.2d 591, 604 (9th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.