Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.kevin Siler, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Eugene Nuth, Warden, M.c.a.c.; Richard Lanham, Commissionerof Correction; Archie Gee, Defendants--appellees, 106 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 106 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 1997) Submitted: Jan. 9, 1997. Decided: Feb. 5, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-323-MJG)

Kevin Siler, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Siler v. Nuth, No. CA-96-323-MJG (D. Md. Aug. 12, 1996; Sept. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.