United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gilberto Romas-miranda, Defendant-appellant, 103 F.3d 143 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 103 F.3d 143 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. *Decided Nov. 7, 1996

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Gilberto Romas-Miranda appeals his 70-month sentence following a guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b) (1) and (b) (2). Romas-Miranda contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to move for a downward departure based on unusual mitigating circumstances and in order to avoid disparity in sentencing; and (2) failing to object to the calculation of his criminal history points and criminal history category.

"Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are not ordinarily reviewed on direct appeal." United States v. Vgeri, 51 F.3d 876, 878 (9th Cir. 1995). Such claims are more appropriately addressed in habeas corpus proceedings unless "the record is sufficiently developed to permit the reviewing court to resolve the issue, or when assistance is so inadequate that it obviously interferes with a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel." Id.; see also United States v. Daly, 974 F.2d 1215, 1218 (9th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). Neither of these circumstances exists here.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.