Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.margaret E. Waller, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Wella Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 101 F.3d 696 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 101 F.3d 696 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted Nov. 7, 1996. Decided Nov. 18, 1996

Margaret E. Waller, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, Sharon Smith Goodwyn, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the employer's motion for summary judgment in this Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12117 (West 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Waller v. Wella Corp., No. CA-95-995-R (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.