Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ferrari North America, Inc., Petitioner-appellee, v. Crown Auto Dealerships, Doing Business As Crown Jaguar,inc., Respondent-appellant, 101 F.3d 686 (2d Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseAppearing for Appellant: Walter E. Forehand, Myers & Forehand, Tallahassee, Fla.
Appearing for Appellee: Carl J. Chiappa, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, N.Y., N.Y.
S.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED.
Before KEARSE, WINTER and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Wood's Opinion and Order dated October 17, 1995.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
