Federal Reporter, Third Series Volume 101 - US Court of Appeals

  Case Date
U.S. v. Martinez* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Co. v. Craig-wilkinson 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Smith v. Indemnity Marine Assur. Ltd 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Miller Tabak Hirsch & Co., Mth Holdings, Inc., Tax Matterspartner, Petitioners-appellees, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellant 101 F.3d 7 11/21/96
Wesley G. Thorn; Cheri Thorn, Plaintiff/appellants, v. International Business Machines, Inc., Defendant/appellee,honeywell, Inc., Defendant 101 F.3d 70 11/22/96
U.S. v. Walden** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
Greenwood v. Hargett** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Molina** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
Powell v. Duplessie** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Foster** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Grantham v. Moffett 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Garcia** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Morrison* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Reed v. Montgomery Wards** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Robles v. Tdcj** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Hunter v. City of Houston** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Mbah** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Van Winkle v. White Swan, Inc.* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Main v. Office Depot, Inc.* 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Mitchell v. Holcomb** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Reese v. Choate* 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Brown v. Johnson** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
Mccray v. Mccormick** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Sappington** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
Stewart v. Russell** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Thomas** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
U.S. v. Huitt** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
U.S. v. Boothe 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
Cullen Center Bank & Trust v. Investmentchoices Corp.* 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
U.S. v. Tanner** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Mcqueen* 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Beasley v. Johnson** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
U.S. v. Barrera-trevino** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Lyle v. Jarrell** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Moore v. Collins* 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Choyce v. Woods** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Stewart v. Jackson** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Williams v. Phillips** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Rainey** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Guzman-morales** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Garcia-martinez** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Betancourt** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
Life Ins. Co. of North America v. Waldrop* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Mtanous** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Easley v. Rodeen** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Reeves v. Johnson** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Robinson v. City of Shreveport** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Nest* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Bonner v. City of Houston* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
U.S. v. Ruiz* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Plain** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
U.S. v. Johnson* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Berger* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
U.S. v. Garza* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
Hernandez v. Muns* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
U.S. v. Uribe* 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
U.S. v. Tract No. 81* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
U.S. v. Balboa* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
U.S. v. Patton** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Brocchini** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Porter** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Bone** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Lewis v. Jenkins** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Graves** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Pyron** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Pullock* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Alaniz* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Woodall v. Johnson** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Athas v. Runyon* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Mitchell v. Parker** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Bolds v. Johnson** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Lightfoot v. Corr. Corp. of Amer.** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Bounds v. Thomas** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Spellman v. Drewery* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Zamora v. Wilson** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
U.S. v. Platero-umanzor** 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Sutherland v. Larson* 101 F.3d 699 10/23/96
Neal v. Mccain** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Smith v. Goodwin** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Sandra K. Fingers, Individually and on Behalf of Herdeceased Son, Kinon B. Fingers, a Minor, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Jackson-madison County General Hospital District, Agovernmental Entity, Bolivar Community Hospital,inc., Mcnairy County General Hospital, Defendants,shelby County Healthcare Corporation D/b/a the Regionalmedical Hospital Center, Methodist Hospital Offayette, Inc., Lebonheur Childrensmedical Center, Inc.,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Derrick Fields, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
James H. Dixon, Petitioner, v. Great Western Resources; Director, Office of Workers'compensation Programs, United States Department Oflabor, Respondents 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
Martin Molina, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Reginald Wilkinson, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Farrugia, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Newspaper Drivers and Handlers' Local Union No. 372,affiliated with the International Brotherhood Ofteamsters, Afl-cio, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the Detroit Newspaper Agency, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/20/96
Thomas Johnson-x, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Kenneth L. Mcginnis; Patricia L. Caruso; Rum Ellerman;arum Meckstroth, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 702 11/15/96
Glenn J. Boggs, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky; Kentucky State University; Louisb. Nunn, Edward T. Breathitt, Allen Lansing, James Luckett,barbara Curry, John Johnson, William Moore, and Edythe Hayesas Members of the Kentucky State University Board of Regentsand in Their Individual Capacities; Their Successors Intheir Official Capacities; Dr. John T. Wolfe, Leroysummers, Lawrence Fortson, and John W. Mason in Theirofficial Capacities and Individually; and Their Successorsin Office in Their Official Capacities, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 702 11/20/96
Eddie Lee Miles, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
State of Ohio, Rehabilitation Services Commission, Petitioner, v. United States Department of Education, Respondent 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Wright v. Love* 101 F.3d 701 10/25/96
Bruton v. Runyon* 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Carter v. Town of New Roads** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Mcdowell v. Hancock City Med. Uni v. ** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Morgan v. Ford** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Doyle v. Kane** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Gulley v. Fowler* 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Lewis v. Ladd* 101 F.3d 701 10/25/96
Suzanna E. Raker, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael Espy, Secretary, Usda, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/15/96
Ronald L. Force, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Memphis, James Ivy, Joseph Laurenzi, Defendants,7rowena Adams, Carlos R. Davis, Paul H. Elrod, Gene Edwardhulley, Luther Mccaskill, Steven Paul Opler, James K. Smith,william D. Taylor, John Vanzandt, Ronald Willis, Troy Todd,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Nick Cole, Petitioner-appellant, v. Jim Dickman, Warden, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Alejandro Palmero, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
Aaron Joseph Boyless, Defendant-appellant, v. United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/20/96
Andrew L. Fabens, Iii, Administrator of the Estate of Karena. Porcelli, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Usair, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/20/96
Consolidated Rail Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Wayne L. Yashinsky, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
David Willis, Petitioner-appellant, v. Joseph Bogan, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 703 11/14/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Vincent C. Keller, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 703 11/21/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Daniel Douglas Swanson, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 703 11/21/96
Daniel L. Ross, Petitioner-appellant (no. 96-3349),defendant-appellant (no. 96-3397), v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee (no. 96-3349),plaintiff-appellee (no. 96-3397) 101 F.3d 702 10/28/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Wantanna Eyvette Mcdowell, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Sandra R. Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/20/96
Linda Quarry, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Securityadministration, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/20/96
Plaintiff v. Defendant 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Pnc Securities Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Finanz-und Gmbh-liedgens; Herbert Liedgens; Mccinternational; Jean Baptiste Pierini;gessellschaft Finanz-vermittiung; Frankjosef Takczick, Defendants,ekkehard Sahm, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Gary Harris, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dennis E. Muchnicki, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Bruce Baskin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bath Township Board of Zoning Appeals, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 702 11/21/96
James Howard, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Doe Alexander; Janet Price; D. Trudell, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
Michael K. Leggett, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 702 11/14/96
U.S. v. Guzman** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Everett v. Hargett** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
U.S. v. One 1990 Ford Ranger* 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Ayala v. Alford** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Mccrary** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
St. John v. Scott** 101 F.3d 700 02/04/97
Connor v. Marmolejo** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
Hicks v. Friederichsen** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
De La Torres v. Usps* 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
U.S. v. Fantroy** 101 F.3d 700 10/26/96
Diaz v. Woods** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Greenwood v. Us Attorney General** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Nelson* 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Wright v. Ieyoub* 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
Mccoy v. Richards** 101 F.3d 700 10/24/96
U.S. v. Johnson** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
U.S. v. Berthiaume** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Stanberry v. Bryant** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Ward v. Allen** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Grant v. Bruton** 101 F.3d 700 10/23/96
Harris v. Parole Board** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Ross v. West** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Meshell v. Lucas** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Batiste v. Colonial Sugars, Inc.* 101 F.3d 701 10/25/96
Ferguson v. Starrett** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Jennings v. Stalder** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Garcia v. Fontenot** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Kennon v. Spinner** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Empire Fire & Marine v. Powers* 101 F.3d 701 10/25/96
U.S. v. Padilla-gallardo** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Joseph v. St. Charles Parish** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
U.S. v. Salinas-salinas** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Small v. Mooneyham** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
Stoker v. Johnson* 101 F.3d 701 10/25/96
Gibson v. Mccoy* 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
U.S. v. Orozco-ramirez* 101 F.3d 701 10/25/96
Lucas v. Scott** 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
U.S. v. King 101 F.3d 701 10/25/96
Stewart v. Detention Center Caddo*d 101 F.3d 701 10/24/96
U.S. v. Lewis* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
Marine Office of America Corp. v. M/v Vulcan 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
U.S. v. Joseph Labarck, Sr.; U.S. v. Raymond Labarck 101 F.3d 693 10/22/96
U.S. v. Alan Gerzan 101 F.3d 693 10/11/96
U.S. v. $12,000 in U.S. Currency, Mukailam Trump Ashrue 101 F.3d 693 10/25/96
U.S. v. Jose Lopez 101 F.3d 693 10/16/96
U.S. v. Amin A. Rashid 101 F.3d 693 10/23/96
U.S. v. Richard Reisig 101 F.3d 693 10/22/96
U.S. v. Kenneth Thomas 101 F.3d 693 10/02/96
U.S. v. Michael White 101 F.3d 693 10/10/96
U.S. v. Edwin C. Ingram 101 F.3d 693 10/30/96
U.S. v. Juan Jimenez-mora #05415-068 101 F.3d 693 10/10/96
U.S. v. Rene Herrera 101 F.3d 693 10/23/96
U.S. v. Jason J. Smith; U.S. v. Frederick Kent; U.S. v. Sean Brian Gannon 101 F.3d 693 10/30/96
U.S. v. Vinod Gulati 101 F.3d 693 10/11/96
U.S. v. Kenya White 101 F.3d 693 10/11/96
U.S. v. Waymon Turner, Jr 101 F.3d 693 10/28/96
U.S. v. Ralph T. Grant, Jr.; U.S. v. Gary Harris 101 F.3d 693 10/21/96
U.S. v. Jeffrey Simpson, A/k/a Rasheed Abdullah 101 F.3d 693 10/09/96
U.S. v. Gustavo Jose Valencia; U.S. v. Esteban Rafael Valencia 101 F.3d 693 10/24/96
U.S. v. George R. Logan, Ii, A/k/a Pooh 101 F.3d 693 10/21/96
U.S. v. Neil H. Rhodes, D/b/a Straight Line Diamond Blades, D/b/adiamond Blades & Quarry Supply 101 F.3d 693 10/30/96
Emmitt Walls v. U.s 101 F.3d 694 10/23/96
Grace E. Wick, (widow of Durvin C. Wick) v. Sky Haven Coal Company, Rockwood Insurance Company 101 F.3d 694 10/11/96
U.S. v. Talib Zayid A/k/a Lewis Hopkins, Jr 101 F.3d 694 10/07/96
Stavros Zafiratos v. Township of Monroe, Gloucester County, Estate of Marthadriver, Alma Alexander, Jeannette Moyer, Jack Rubba, Charlesfiore, James Atkinson, Albert Driver, Jack Luby; S & F Minifruit Market, Inc., Stavros S. Zafiratos, President v. Stateof New Jersey, Albertson, Ward & Mccaffery, Township Ofmonroe, Gloucester County Prosecutors Office, Almaalexander, Jeannette Moyer, Jack Rubba, Charles Fiore, Jamesatkinson, Albert Driver, Estate of Martha 101 F.3d 694 10/22/96
John Wallace, Kim Wallace v. Tesco Engineering, Inc., Wilkerson Corporation 101 F.3d 694 10/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.terence Kenneth O'neal, Plaintiff-appellant, v. T.e. Merkel; Nurse Cashwell; Nurse Allen; Nurse Davis;mr. Conn, Defendants-appellees,andfranklin E. Freeman, Jr.; Gary Dixon; Doctor Lowy; Doctorshaw; Doctor Castalloe; Harry Allsbrook; Mr.cherry, Defendants 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.saradindu Mahapatra; Alok Kumar, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. R. Bradburn, Baltimore County Police; G. Darrell Russell,baltimore County District Court Judge, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Edward Yulick v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security 101 F.3d 694 10/11/96
U.S. v. Jovar Williams 101 F.3d 694 10/16/96
Patricia Reynolds Weigel, (formerly Patricia Reynolds) v. John L. Del Buono v. Richard F.x. Regan, Esq., Hayden, Perleand Silber, Jane Does, Officer, Jane Does 1-25,john Does, John Does 1-25 101 F.3d 694 10/22/96
U.S. v. One 1985 Gray Mercedes Benz 190e, Vin #wdbda24c8ff120972 101 F.3d 693 10/18/96
U.S. v. Gregory Newton 101 F.3d 693 10/09/96
U.S. v. Thommie Hampton 101 F.3d 693 10/31/96
U.S. v. Errol Aloysius Lee, A/k/a China Man 101 F.3d 693 10/30/96
U.S. v. Levern Myers, A/k/a Baldy 101 F.3d 693 10/07/96
Janis L. Wagner v. Defense Activities Federal Credit Union, Michael Prettyman,charles E. Del Marcelle, As Agents for Dafcu 101 F.3d 694 10/21/96
Deborah Williams v. City of Philadelphia, Richard Neal, Police Commissioner 101 F.3d 694 10/18/96
U.S. v. Trevor B. Yandy, A/k/a Terrence J. Kane, A/k/a James Conroy,a/k/a David Mager 101 F.3d 694 10/10/96
U.S. v. David L. Nahodil 101 F.3d 693 10/25/96
U.S. v. $12,000 in U.S. Currency, Mukailan Trump Ashrue 101 F.3d 693 10/09/96
Alma Reigh, (daughter of Russell Prosser) v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.s.department of Labor 101 F.3d 692 10/11/96
U.S. v. Salim Davis 101 F.3d 692 10/16/96
U.S. v. Joe Louis Dowell, Bruce James Roberts 101 F.3d 692 10/09/96
In Re Request from Principality of Liechtenstein Forassistance in Matter of Ronald Lee Tabas, Outvestfoundation (ns 1/93) 101 F.3d 692 10/10/96
U.S. v. George Rocky Balboa 101 F.3d 692 10/21/96
U.S. v. Norman Artabane 101 F.3d 692 10/30/96
Milo G. Shaffer v. Susan Berk, Jeff Kehlert, Apwu, Tony Bernat, Usps 101 F.3d 692 10/25/96
Richard Restifo v. James Magill, Jay P. Snyder Jacob Fell, Fred Williamson,ralph J. Prosceno, Mary Ann Weldon, Irv Tabaac,grover Stults, Robert Rynkiewicz 101 F.3d 692 10/16/96
U.S. v. Prince Ebo, Jude Amusionwu, Anselm Ogike, A/k/a Ash Canicedike, Peters C. Ukandu, Friday Onyekere Ogbuehi, A/k/a Fred 101 F.3d 692 10/09/96
U.S. v. Ronald K. Conner, John J. Titus, A/k/a Boo Boo, Robert W.hayden, Alfred M. Saldamarco 101 F.3d 692 10/18/96
Plaze Henry Meadows v. Mary Keating Disabato, Chairwoman New Jersey State Paroleboard, William Fauver, Commissioner, New Jersey Departmentof Corrections, Willis Morton, Warden, New Jersey Stateprison, Gloria Burke, Danny Lebak 101 F.3d 691 10/31/96
In Re Nicholas F. Marchese, Grace Marie Marchese; Nicholasf. Marchese, Grace Marie Marchese v. Counties Investment Corporation 101 F.3d 691 10/11/96
William Mundy v. Ara Food Mark Service, Brian Keith, Schroek, Mr., Kimberly,mr., F. Butts, Mrs 101 F.3d 691 10/28/96
In Re Thomas W. Olick, Kathryn A. Olick 101 F.3d 691 10/23/96
Henry Rauser v. Robert Freeman 101 F.3d 691 10/21/96
U.S. v. Antonious L. Clark 101 F.3d 692 10/16/96
Ronald Mahonski v. City of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, Philip E. Preziosi, Asmayor of City of Williamsport 101 F.3d 691 10/22/96
Edward Perkovic, Grace Perkovic v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation 101 F.3d 691 10/23/96
U.S. v. Frederick L. Deratto 101 F.3d 692 10/07/96
U.S. v. Harold Jeffrey Berry 101 F.3d 692 10/21/96
U.S. v. Jose Luis Garcia-avila 101 F.3d 692 10/02/96
U.S. v. Lee Barnes 101 F.3d 692 10/21/96
U.S. v. Hector Gaviria 101 F.3d 692 10/30/96
Dairo Rios v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, E.w. Morris, Warden, F.c.i. Fairton 101 F.3d 692 10/31/96
U.S. v. Mark P. Binstein 101 F.3d 692 10/10/96
U.S. v. Ronald Edward Smith 101 F.3d 693 10/18/96
U.S. v. Jong Suk Lee 101 F.3d 693 10/30/96
Robert Tuerk v. Otis Elevator Company, Inc., Travelers Insurance Company, Inc 101 F.3d 692 10/28/96
U.S. v. Walter Brown 101 F.3d 692 10/16/96
U.S. v. Michael E. Burrell 101 F.3d 692 10/23/96
U.S. v. Robert M. Cohn 101 F.3d 692 10/10/96
U.S. v. Robert F. Gallagher, Sr., A/k/a John H. Heller 101 F.3d 692 10/24/96
U.S. v. Gaetano Aita 101 F.3d 692 10/07/96
U.S. v. Shah Afridi, Alam Gir Khan 101 F.3d 692 10/10/96
Eugene R. Taylor, Ricky R. Collins v. Miller, C.o., Purcell, C.o., Hearing Examiner Jones, Mr. Figmik 101 F.3d 692 10/21/96
Luis Tamayo v. U.S. Parole Commission 101 F.3d 692 10/30/96
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company A/s/o Braha Industries, Inc. v. Polaris Corporation D/b/a Hageman Roofing 101 F.3d 692 10/11/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.faith D. Bellamy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; U.s.department of Defense; William Perry; Uniformedservices University of the Healthsciences, Medical School,defendants--appellees 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.stephen Talmage, Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
U.S. v. Quinn* 101 F.3d 697 10/17/96
U.S. v. Luna* 101 F.3d 697 10/14/96
U.S. v. Coscarelli* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
Townley v. Rader* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
Freedom Communications, Inc. v. Mancias 101 F.3d 697 10/17/96
U.S. v. Richey* 101 F.3d 697 10/17/96
U.S. v. Gonzalez-rivas* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
Bausemer v. Reich* 101 F.3d 697 10/14/96
Broadhead v. Hartford Cas. Ins 101 F.3d 697 10/15/96
Sheth v. Bw/ip International* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
Bishop v. Lee* 101 F.3d 697 10/14/96
U.S. v. Gonzalez-martinez* 101 F.3d 697 10/14/96
Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
In Matter of J. Edgar Clayton* 101 F.3d 697 10/15/96
Bassingthwaighte v. Mcdermott 101 F.3d 697 10/17/96
Martin v. Baker* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
U.S. v. Piperi 101 F.3d 697 10/17/96
Holmes v. Garcia* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
Washington v. La Lottery Corp.* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
U.S. v. Soliz* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
Windwalker v. Richardson* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
Sawyer v. Countz** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
Parker v. Sinco Const. Ser v. Inc 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Calderon** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
U.S. v. Garcia** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
U.S. v. Yett* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Ard** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
Texport Oil v. Lloyd Underwriters 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
Huie v. Johnson* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Johnson** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
Altschul v. Tx. Board of Pardons* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
U.S. v. Thomas* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
Halkias v. General Dynamics 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Morales-lopez* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
United Artists v. City of N.o.* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
Robertson v. City of Sugarland* 101 F.3d 698 10/21/96
Sms Financial Ii Llc v. Nakamura* 101 F.3d 698 10/22/96
U.S. v. Colvin** 101 F.3d 698 10/23/96
U.S. v. Ruiz* 101 F.3d 697 10/18/96
In Matter of Great Plains Pipe Line Const., Inc 101 F.3d 697 10/17/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.brenda J. Marks, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Supreme Court of Virginia; Christopher Hutton,commonwealth's Attorney City of Hampton; James C.o'shields; Hampton General District Court, Eighth Judicialdistrict; Honorable Henry D. Kashouty; Honorable Wilfordtaylor, Jr.; Hono Rable William C. Andrews, Iii; Harriettespencer, Clerk, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.rosetta Rushing, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia School for the Deaf Andblind; Don Smith, Principal, Virginia School Forthe Deaf and Blind, Defendants--appellees 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Trevor Grant, A/k/a Roy Arrindell, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.rachael G. Rogerson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Wal-mart Stores, Incorporated, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.helen Jackson, Petitioner, v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Unitedstates Department of Labor; Patsy Trucking,incorporated; West Virginia Coalworkers' Pneumoconiosis Fund,incorporated, Respondents 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.george Christian, Jr.; Marion E. Christian, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.dala F. Sibay, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mounzer F. Sibay; Magda Sibay; Johnston & Roche;counselor Field; United States President of Americaclinton; Jack Quinn, Counsel Or; the United Statesattorney General; United States Department of Justice;jeffrey Axelrad; Eric H. Holder, United States Attorney;federal Deposit National Corporation; Nations Title Lifeinsurance of New York; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Nationalcorporation; All States Insurance National Corporation;crestar Mortgage Corporation; Richard T. Cregger, Trusteeforclosure; Jessie B. Wilson, Iii, Commissioner of the Actfairfax County; Atlas Assurance of America--dean, Homer;homer W. Smith; John M. Deutch; Central Intelligenceagency (ciaoprt); United States State Department Emp;marilyn Macafee, Defendants-appellees.dala F. Sibay, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mounzer F. Sibay; Magda Sibay; Johnston & Roche;counselor Field; United States President of Americaclinton; Jack Quinn, Counselor; the United States Attorneygeneral; United States Department of Justice; Jeffreyaxelrad; Eric H. Holder, United States Attorney; Federaldeposit National Corporation; Nations Title Life Insuranceof New York; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Nationalcorporation; All States Insurance National Corporation;crestar Mortgage Corporation; Richard T. Cregger, Trusteeforclosure; Jessie B. Wilson, Iii, Commissioner of the Actfairfax County; Atlas Assurance of America--dean, Homer;homer W. Smith; John M. Deutch; Central Intelligenceagency (ciaoprt); United States State Department Emp;marilyn Macafee, Defendants-appellees.dala F. Sibay, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mounzer F. Sibay; Magda Sibay, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.emily Mangus, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.paul E. Childress, Petitioner, v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Company; Director, Office Ofworkers' Compensation Programs, United Statesdepartment of Labor, Respondents 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.christopher W. Nygren, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.uzoma Chidozie Anukwuem, Petitioner, v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. St. Matthew Troy Evans, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.herschell L. Harris, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sue King, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.in Re Nathaniel Hoover, Petitioner 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.charles S. Briles, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sandy Henderson Briles Surratt; Wachovia Bank and Trustcompany, N.a., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.in Re Toney Tucker Enterprises, Incorporated, T/a Lexingtonpark Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Debtor.meldon S. Hollis, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant,andtoney Tucker, Plaintiff, v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, Defendant-appellee.in Re Toney Tucker Enterprises, Incorporated, T/a Lexingtonpark Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Debtor.toney Tucker, Plaintiff-appellant,andmeldon S. Hollis, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Millard Craven, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 695 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.horace Banks, Petitioner-appellant, v. H.r. Powell, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.charel Daniell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the Old Line Life Insurance Company of America; Unitedservices Life Insurance Company; Standardmarketing, Incorporated; Budget Termbrokers; Keith Klima; Randymurray, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 695 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Cortez Dorian Dominie Sutton, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Phillip R. Green, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Edward Litman, Claimant-appellant,and1983 Bmw 528i, Vin Wbadk7302d7956669, Defendant 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Nadine Patricia Whetzel, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Julia Mcmillon, A/k/a Julia Walker, A/k/a Julia Bivens,defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Joseph Alvin Ray, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/15/96
U.S. v. Wilson* 101 F.3d 697 10/14/96
Green v. Fairmont Hotel Management* 101 F.3d 697 10/14/96
U.S. v. Bell* 101 F.3d 697 10/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.jack Ray Vigue, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Fred W. Greene; John E. Lightfoot; Edward L. Vasser; Drewthompson; Eugene Johnson; Julie Bonds; Louis B.cei; Nurse Copeland, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Defendant-appellee, v. Donald Lee Stotler, Plaintiff-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Frederick Leonard Hooper, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Harold Dean Rivers, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Cynthia Chapman Reavis, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ricky Nelson Stone, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Timothy Wayne Dodson, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Victor Manuel Vale, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul Darnell Kearney, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 696 11/15/96
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.margaret E. Waller, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Wella Corporation, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 696 11/18/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Anthony Washington, Also Known As Richard Thomas, Also Knownas Wheeler Washington, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 703 11/14/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Juan Sanchez, A/k/a John Sanchez, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 703 11/20/96
Herr-voss Corporation, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Delta Brands, Inc., and Samuel F. Savariego, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 714 11/08/96
Apolonio L. Abellanes Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/07/96
Charles R. Sekerak, Petitioner, v. Railroad Retirement Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/04/96
Thomas & Sons Building Contractor, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 714 11/08/96
Larry D. Hunter, Petitioner, v. Department of the Air Force, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/07/96
Dinah Wolverton Perkins, Appellant, v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postalservice, Appellee 101 F.3d 714 11/07/96
Robert Thomas, Petitioner, v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/01/96
Yuh-ichiro Ichikawa, Aya Natira, Kaoru Matsuo, Keiko Aoyama,fumiko Matsumura, Yukihiro Nishiyama, Kenichi Matsubara,takemitsu Nagahata, Hiroo Hoshino, Jun-ichi Seki, Koichinarasaka and Yujiro Hayashi, Appellants, v. William A. Slusarchyk and Robert Zahler, Appellees 101 F.3d 714 11/12/96
Morris Hoffman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Wisner Classic Manufacturing Co., Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 714 11/01/96
Jeffrey A. Lanning, Petitioner, v. Department of Defense, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/08/96
Mary Louise Martinez, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/21/96
Ray L. Kagel, Jr., Petitioner, v. Department of the Army, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
Charles J. Caccioppo, Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
Willie L. Williams, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/01/96
Randall F. Pagana, Petitioner, v. Department of the Air Force, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/12/96
Julian F. Pabalan, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/08/96
Anthony Munoz, Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/08/96
William W. Thomas, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 714 11/01/96
Glenn R. Bernard, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 714 11/06/96
Thomas Oskiera, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/12/96
Bruce J. Sherman, Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Diana L. Kelly, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Go Medical Industries Pty, Ltd., (a.c.n. 009 018 339),plaintiff-appellant, v. C.r. Bard, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Wesley E. Amend, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Simplicio B. Imatong, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Rex S. Caldwell, Petitioner, v. National Security Agency, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Russell J. Lindstedt, Plaintiff-appellee, v. the United States, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
David R. Yeskoo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Dominic A. Ricchio, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ascension International, Inc., Steven Gillaspie Backmanproducts, Inc., and Sidmar Manufacturing, Inc.,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
In Re Donald R. Milligan 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Hewlett-packard Company, Appellant, v. David J. Barram, Acting Administrator, General Servicesadministration, Appellee 101 F.3d 714 11/01/96
A & M Cleaning Products, Inc., Appellant, v. Ramco-usa, Inc., Appellee 101 F.3d 714 11/12/96
Shirley Durst-lee, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/12/96
Rosa v. Rowland-clum Petitioner, v. Department of the Army Respondent 101 F.3d 714 11/12/96
In Re Datapoint Corporation, Petitioner 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Robert L. Hoffman, Petitioner, v. Department of Treasury, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
George B. Edmonds, Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
S-tron, Appellant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Appellee 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
In Re Ulyesses B. Adams, Petitioner 101 F.3d 713 11/01/96
Emilio D. Sahagun, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/25/96
Estate of Brown J. Akin Jr., and Jean C. Akin, Individually,plaintiffs-appellants, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 712 09/11/96
Fernando Semidey, Petitioner, v. Department of the Navy, Respondent 101 F.3d 712 09/13/96
Luis Roberto Pabon-gutierrez v. U.s 101 F.3d 711 10/30/96
Century Wrecker Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-appellant, v. E.r. Buske Manufacturing Company, Inc., E.r. Buskedistributing Company, and E.r. Buske, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 712 09/11/96
Henry T. Mckelvey, Petitioner, v. Department of Defense, Respondent 101 F.3d 712 09/11/96
Beauty Time, Inc., Beauty Makers, Inc., and R. Richard Riso,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Vu Skin Systems, Inc., Bjv, Dpm Skin Systems, Inc., Andmarion M. Vujevich, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 712 09/16/96
Ornatube Enterprise Co., Ltd., Plaintiff/appellant,andliang-houh Shieh, Sanctioned Party-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee,andhannibal Industries, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 712 09/04/96
James R. Hampton, Jr., Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 712 10/28/96
U.S. v. Ansong* 101 F.3d 710 10/30/96
U.S. v. Harper* 101 F.3d 710 10/30/96
Miller v. Hall*** 101 F.3d 710 11/01/96
Speakman v. Thompson*** 101 F.3d 710 11/08/96
Slater v. Mcclung* 101 F.3d 710 11/08/96
Dewitt v. Comr. of Irs* 101 F.3d 710 11/01/96
Kappler v. West*** 101 F.3d 710 11/06/96
Hill v. Sessions* 101 F.3d 710 11/05/96
Turner v. Denmark* 101 F.3d 710 11/06/96
U.S. v. Williams*** 101 F.3d 710 10/29/96
Simplico B. Imatong, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 712 09/11/96
Michael J. Collins, Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 712 10/28/96
Bernard M. Davis, Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/31/96
Frederick D. Overly, Petitioner, v. Department of Defense, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/31/96
Tamarack Products, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-appellant, v. Moore Business Forms, Inc., Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
Gelacio S. Pangilinan, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
Gary Fuller, Sr., Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/23/96
Frederick Tallie, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/23/96
Patrick S. Noble, Petitioner, v. Department of Justice, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
James Greenwell, Jr., Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/31/96
Michael W. Blodgett, Plaintiff-appellant,andaudry Florence and Philip F. Florence, Individually and Onbehalf of the Empire Paper Company Pension Planand Trust, Plaintiffs,andmichael W. Blodgett, As Trustee for the T.g. Morgan, Inc.,defined Benefit Pension Plan; Diane S. Blodgett,individually and As Beneficiary of the T.g. Morgan, Inc.,defined Benefit Pension Plan; Warren Hartje and Jeanhartje, Individually and for the Warren Hartje Sales Companyemployee Pension Plan and Trust; and Eleanor Carlson, Plaintiffs, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
William J. Connolly, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
Doris L. Holloway, Petitioner, v. Department of the Air Force, Respondent 101 F.3d 712 10/28/96
Digital Equipment Corporation, Appellant, v. David J. Barram, Acting Administrator, General Servicesadministration, Appellee 101 F.3d 712 10/30/96
Paulette Purson, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent,andunited States Postal Service, Intervenor 101 F.3d 712 09/11/96
Charles C. Aulgur, David A. Dipasquale, Thomas K. Mcdonaldand Alan E. Kidd, Appellants, v. Fernand Bertheau and Patrick Maire, Appellees 101 F.3d 712 10/29/96
Martha Tallabas, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
Victor Company, Llc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ortho Organizers, Inc., Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 713 10/22/96
Dale A. Driscoll, Petitioner, v. Department of the Navy, Respondent 101 F.3d 713 10/23/96
Linda Diane King-roberts, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Ray L. Kagel, Jr., Petitioner, v. Department of the Army, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Larry Weyant and Charles Weyant, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. George S. Okst, Irvin Richard Weber, Joseph Peter Auberger,jr., Lawrence Mueller, Defendants,george S. Okst and Joseph Peter Auberger, Jr., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 845 12/03/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Fevzi Ekinci, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 838 12/03/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Pascal Ballistrea, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 827 11/25/96
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner-cross-respondent,andthe New York Hotel and Motel Trades Council, Afl-cio, Intervenor, v. the Staten Island Hotel Limited Partnership, D/b/a Thestaten Island Hotel, Respondent-cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 858 12/03/96
Frank Adkins; Robert Kean; Federico Montinez; John D.johnson; Jerry Kahklen, et al., Claimants-appellants, v. Trans-alaska Pipeline Liability Fund, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 86 11/21/96
In Re Application of David Esses for Assistance Before Aforeign Tribunal.david Esses, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Linda Esses Hanania, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 873 12/04/96
Nery Esperanza Fuentes-argueta, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Edward Mcelroy,district Director of Ins, Janet Reno, Unitedstates Attorney General, Respondents 101 F.3d 867 12/04/96
Lee N. Koehler, Petitioner-appellee, v. the Bank of Bermuda Limited, Respondent-appellant 101 F.3d 863 12/04/96
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8387, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 13,956united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alan Keith Hunter, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bart Reed, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 82 11/20/96
Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults; Irene Hoops; Frankgatland; Frances Sensale Lenzo; Joyce B. Aron; Lillianmelville Hamid; Margaret Devoe; Jane Doe; Rachel Roe;lora Hoops; Andrew Gatland; James Sensale; Lourdes Aron;glenna Hamid; Karen Devoe; Richard Roe, As Parents Andguardians Of, Respectively, Lora Hoops; Andrew Gatland;james Sensale; Lourdes Aron; Glenna Hamid; Karen Devoe;john Doe, and Rachel Roe, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. John B. Wingate, As Commissioner of the Suffolk Countydepartment of Social Services and Suffolk County; Georgepataki, As Governor of the State of New York; Robert J.gaffney, As County Executive of Suffolk County; Thomas A.maul; James L. Stone and Brian Wing, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 818 12/09/96
Kyle Johnson; Leticia Johnson, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Ivan Watkins; Chris Calloway, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 792 12/10/96
Norman E. Dickinson, Petitioner, v. State of Maine, Respondent 101 F.3d 791 12/12/96
Alfredo A. Kolster, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 785 12/04/96
Lila Gold; Howard Lasher; Delores Vargas; Arcadiarodriguez; Audra Rodriguez; Gloria Hacken; Paulpodhaizer; Howard Babbush; Pedrolamboy, Plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees, v. Michael Feinberg; New York City Board of Elections;kenneth Evans, Defendants-appellees,john Sampson; Adele Cohen; Martin Bromberger,defendants-appellees-cross-appellants 101 F.3d 796 11/26/96
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8284, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 13,781united States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gregory Alan Etherton, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 80 11/18/96
United States Fire Insurance Co.; International Insurancecompany, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. National Gypsum Co., N/k/a Asbestos Claims Managementcorporation; Ngc Settlement Trust, Defendants-appellants,center for Claims Resolution, Defendant 101 F.3d 813 11/04/96
James K. Lee, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Edwards, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 805 10/31/96
Dinorah Coto; David Fernendez; Ann Gandolfo; Robertmoore; Anna Moore; Louis Campbell; Luciano Navarro;susan Dougherty; William Hinckley; and Robert Dicarlo,candidate for the Republican Nomination for State Senatorfrom the 23rd Senate District, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. New York City Board of Elections; Paul Mejias, President;frederick Umane, Secretary; Weyman A. Carey; Douglaskellner; Ferdinand C. Marchi; Seymour Sheldon; Rond'angelo; Gertrude Strohm; Vincent Velella; Kathleen M.wagner, Commissioners and Daniel Defrancesco, Executivedirector, Defendants-appellees,john Gangemi, Candidate for the Republican Nomination Forstate Senator from the 23rd Senate District; Guymolinari and Joseph Silva, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 803 11/26/96
Hellenic American Neighborhood Action Committee, Plaintiff-appellee, v. the City of New York, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, City of Newyork Human Resources Administration, Marva Livingstonhammons, Deputy Commissioner Seth Diamond, Deputycommissioner Violet Mitchell and City of New York Departmentof Youth Services, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 877 12/05/96
In Re Pegasus Agency, Inc., Debtor.pegasus Agency, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Nicholas Grammatikakis, Also Known As Nicholas Grammas,defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 882 12/05/96
James R. Philbin, Jr. v. Trans Union Corporation; Trw Credentials James Philbin,jr., Appellant 101 F.3d 957 12/06/96
Ellis Wayne Felker, Larry Grant Lonchar, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Tony Turpin, Wayne Garner, John Doe, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 95 11/13/96
John Olson, Appellant, v. General Electric Astrospace Aka Martin-marrietta Astrospace 101 F.3d 947 12/18/96
United States of America, Appellant, v. Romeo Romualdi 101 F.3d 971 12/11/96
Gregory Warren Beaver, Petitioner--appellant, v. J.d. Netherland, Warden, Respondent--appellee 101 F.3d 977 11/12/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Whitt Neal, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 993 11/27/96
52 Soc.sec.rep.ser. 257, Medicare & Medicaid Guidep 44,912cabell Huntington Hospital, Incorporated, a Statutorycorporation; Charleston Area Medical Center, Incorporated;ohio Valley Medical Center, Inc.; West Virginia Universityhospital, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services,defendant-appellant,andbruce C. Vladeck, Administrator, Health Care Financingadministration; Susan Hereford, Manager, Provideraudit and Reimbursement, Blue Cross Andblue Shield of Virginia, Defendants 101 F.3d 984 11/27/96
Donald Lee Craig, Petitioner-appellant, v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary Department of Corrections,state of Florida, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorneygeneral, Attorney General of the Stateof Florida, Respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 98 11/15/96
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Appellant, v. United States Department of Health and Human Services;united States of America 101 F.3d 939 12/04/96
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Estevan M. Muniz, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 93 08/06/96
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 44,913,96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8484,96 Daily Journal D.a.r. 14,038paul M. Gamboa, Plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee, v. Susan M. Chandler,* Director, Dept. of Humanservices, State of Hawai'i,defendant-third-party-plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health & Human Services,defendant-third-party-defendant-appellee.paul M. Gamboa, Plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellee, v. Susan M. Chandler, Director, Dept. of Human Services, Stateof Hawai'i,defendant-third-party-plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health & Human Services,defendant-third-party-defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 90 11/22/96
Kemp Yarborough, Petitioner-appellant, v. John P. Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 894 12/10/96
Dan Still, Acting Commissioner of the New York City Dept. Ofmental Health, Mental Retardation and Alcoholism Services;the New York City Dept. of Mental Health, Mentalretardation, & Alcoholism Services; the City of New York,petitioners-appellants, v. Barbara A. Debuono, As Commissioner of the New York Statedept. of Health; the New York State Dept. Ofmental Health; Mr. " ", on Behalf Of"e.m.", an Infant,respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 888 12/05/96
Pinnacle Consultants, Ltd., in Its Own Behalf and on Behalfof Shareholders of Leucadia National Corporation,plaintiff-appellant, v. Leucadia National Corporation; Ian M. Cumming; Joseph S.steinberg; Paul M. Dougan; Lawrence D. Glaubinger; Melvinl. Hirsch; James E. Jordan, Jr.; John W. Jordan, Ii Andjesse Clyde Nichols, Iii, Individually and As Officers Anddirectors of Leucadia National Corporation, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 900 12/10/96
72 Fair Empl.prac.cas. (bna) 979,69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,455rui Tavora, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York Mercantile Exchange, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 907 12/12/96
Ann K. Stehney, Appellant, v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense; J. Michaelmcconnell, Director, National Security Agency/centralsecurity Service; Lee Hanna, Former Chief of Managementservices, National Security Agency/central Security Service;jeanne Zimmer, Chief of Management Services, Nationalsecurity Agency/central Security Service; the Institute Fordefense Analyses, Center for Communications Research, Adelaware Corporation; David M. Goldschmidt, Director, Theinstitute for Defense Analyses, Center for Communications Research 101 F.3d 925 12/03/96
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8483, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 14,037united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Byeong Chul Choi, Aka Edward H. Choi, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 92 11/22/96
United States of America v. Merritt G. Stansfield, Jr., Appellant 101 F.3d 909 12/02/96
William L. Taylor, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. State of Rhode Island, et al., Defendants, Appellants 101 F.3d 780 12/04/96
American Portland Cement Alliance, et al., Petitioners, v. Environmental Protection Agency and Carol M. Browner, Respondents,cement Kiln Recycling Coalition, et al., Intervenors 101 F.3d 772 12/13/96
William L. Steffens, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 716 11/18/96
Albert A. Waters, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/15/96
Dale E. Boyce, Petitioner, v. Department of the Navy, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/21/96
John A. Lanza, Petitioner, v. Department of the Army, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Frederick D. Overly, Petitioner, v. Department of Defense, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/15/96
Norris Hunley, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/15/96
Leonard P. Machulas, Petitioner, v. Department of the Air Force, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Calvin J. Weber, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 12/26/96
Loren W. Zephier, Petitioner, v. Department of Health and Human Services, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
William Bradshaw and Robert Shepherd, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Igloo Products Corporation, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 716 11/15/96
Robert Flores, Plaintiff-petitioner, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company and Western-cullen-hayes,inc., Defendants-respondents 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Steven J. Ciecwesz, Petitioner, v. Department of Treasury, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Janice L. Bertini, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Daniel W. Bradley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Chiron Corporation, William J. Rutter, Edward E. Penhoet,michael Houghton, Qui Lim Choo, Ortho Diagnosticsystems, Inc., and George Kuo,defendant-appellees. (two Cases) 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff-appellee, v. the United States, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 715 11/13/96
Yu, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
In Re Akiho Ota and Takao Iizuka 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
Larry B. Guillory, Petitioner, v. Department of the Navy, Respondent 101 F.3d 715 11/14/96
James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Petitioner, v. Merilyn O. Jackson, Respondent,andmerit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Carl Wayne Stewart, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Petitioner v. United States of America and Surface Transportation Board, Respondentsunited Transportation Union, et al., Intervenors 101 F.3d 718 12/20/96
Patrick W. Dooley, Petitioner, v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Respondent 101 F.3d 717 01/17/97
Conchita T. Ayson, Petitioner, v. Merit System Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 717 11/26/96
James E. Akins, et al., Appellants v. Federal Election Commission, Appellee 101 F.3d 731 01/03/97
Gerry Scott, Appellee, v. District of Columbia, et al., Appellants 101 F.3d 748 01/15/97
United States of America, Appellee v. Hung Shun Lin, A/k/a Chang Wu, Appellant 101 F.3d 760 01/28/97
Marsilio Digiovanni, As Trustee of the Digiovanni Familytrust, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Kjessler and Robert W. Cochran, Plaintiffs-intervenors.fishing Vessel Owners & Marine Ways, Inc.,plaintiff-intervenor-appellant, v. Peter M. Mcmahon, a Single Man; John Frankenfield, in Hisseparate Estate and Bayside/bayview Yacht Sales Inc., an Wacorp., in Personam; M/v Royal Princess, O.n., 566682, Herengines, Machinery, Appurtenances, Etc. in Rem, Defendants 101 F.3d 76 11/20/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Gary Apker, Appellant 101 F.3d 75 12/06/96
Franklin D. Davis, Petitioner, v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 717 11/21/96
Raymond Marez, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 717 11/21/96
James E. Mcdonald, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
In Re Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.a., Appellant 101 F.3d 716 11/15/96
Armand E. Lavertue, Petitioner, v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Russell N. Kell, Petitioner, v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Jesse v. Myers, Petitioner, v. Department of Agriculture, Respondent 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Clotide Persyn, Ind v. and As Ind.exec. of Est. of Darson H.persyn, Dec'd; Florent Baecke; Mildred Baecke; Paulpersyn; Erma Persyn; Raul Jimenez, Sr.; Aviel Broekhove;josie A. Broakhove; Celeste Persyn Worrick, Ind v. and Asind.exec. of Est. of Leona Persyn, Dec'd; Richard Persyn;gabriel Thienpont; Frank Persyn, Henry Joe Persyn, Leslieann Persyn, Lorraine Steubing, and Laura Persyn, Successorsin Title to Emma Persyn, Dec'd; Mary Rosenbush; Margaretmilam; Hortense Broekhove; 4m Properties, Inc.; Somersetroad Joint Venture, Acting by and Through Its Members Terrybritton, Martin Weiss, and Michael Weiss; Aviel L.broekhove; Phil M. Broekhove; Emiel P. Broekhove; Mariaaelvoet, Devisee of Remi Aelvoet; Marshall Aelvoet;richard Aelvoet; Elsie Aelvoet Verelst; Raymond Wauters,successor in Title to Aline Wauters, Dec'd; Raymondwauters, Successor in Title to Aline Wauters, Dec'd;raymond Wauters; Lorraine Wauters; Irma Verstuyft, Ind v. and As Ind.exec. of Est. of George Verstuyft, Dec'd; Normanverstuyft; Michael Raymond Verstuyft; Gary Edwardverstuyft, David Alphonse Verstuyft, Richard John Verstuyft,julia Louise Verstuyft, and Shirley P. Verstuyft, Successorsin Title to Raymond Verstuyft, Dec'd; Eunice Verstuyft,ind v. and As Ind.exec. of Robert Verstuyft, Dec'd; Margaretverstuyft; Edward C. Verstuyft; John D. Verstuyft; Mariedurst; Roger Verstuyft; Patricia Verstuyft; Marvinverstuyft; Sharon Elaine Eisenhauer; Mildred Baecke, Ind v. and As Successor to Clara Verschelden, Dec'd; Alene Buys,ind v. and As Successor to Clara Vershelden, Dec'd; Claraverstuyft Persyn; Henry Verstuyft; Julia Verstuyft; A.c.lopez; Margaret G. Brown, George Brown, Ii, Mary Alicepons, Richard Brown, Daniel Brown, and Margaret Rose Brown,successors in Title to George Brown, Dec'd; Helaman R.duran; Irene L. Duran; Henry B. Garcia; Rosie R. Garcia;estates of Joe Centeno, Sr., Dec'd, and Jesusa Centeno,dec'd, Their Devisees and Heirs Eloy Centeno, Lily Centenoalfonsin, Alice B. Centeno Little, Charles Saladana, Carmengarcia, and Roland Naumann, Co-administrators with Willsannexed; Margaret Thienpont; Aline Oyer; Marie Dedock;robert Cadena; John Miller; Comcal Group; J.l. Guerra,jr., Ind.exec. of Est. of J.l. Guerra, Sr., Dec'd; Andhermina L. Guerra; Plaintiffs,andcraig L. Austin, Sanctioned Party-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Warminster Fiberglass Company, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Delta Fiberglass Structures, Inc., Aka, Delta Reinforcedplastic Structures, Inc., Defendant/cross-appellant 101 F.3d 716 11/14/96
Hooters of Amer. v. Carolina Wings* 101 F.3d 710 11/06/96
Walker v. Atty. Gen. - State of Al* 101 F.3d 710 11/06/96
Gevork Petrosyan, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Randy Anthony Scales, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Trujillo, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
Sue Monroe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Marshals; U.S. Department of Justice; George Burke,individually and Jointly in His Official Capacity,defendants,andjudy Smith, Registered Nurse in Her Official Capacity; Cityof Kent; United States of America; Nancy Lederwood Vanvleek, Physician's Assistant; Dennis Bylerly, Individuallyand Jointly in His Official Capacity; King County Healthdepartment, Dba King County Jail Health, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 706 11/15/96
Cuoc T. Ngo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater,* Commissioner, Socialsecurity Administration, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
Reginald Wheeler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Gomez, Warden; D. Martin, Sergeant; D. Mcmahon,sergeant; Thomas M. Hornung, Deputy Warden;bonnie Garibay; W. Vaughn, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Los Angeles County Homecare Workers Union, Service Employeesinternational Union, Local 434-b, Afl-cio, Respondent 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Arlo Wesley Day; Aka Christopher Thomas Bader Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
John Earl Tomlinson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Allen Nailor, Agent, Internal Revenue Service; Josemelendez, Treasury Agent, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
Paul Peter Schrey, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dr. Perry, Chief Medical Officer; Mta Baxter, 3 Watch;m.h. Carrillo, Warden, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Raul Valenzuela-cervantes, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 10/23/96
Maryland National Bank, Plaintiff-appellee,matthew O. Jones, Claimant-appellant, v. the Vessel Madam Chapel, Etc., Defendant 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Francisco Jimenez-marmolejo, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/15/96
Wallace K. Nelson, Petitioner, v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs; Guy F.atkinson Construction Company; Wausau Insuranceco., Respondents 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alejandro Pacheco-chong, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Brian David Hill, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
Flora Villalta, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
Stephen Taylor, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of the Social Securityadministration, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 706 11/15/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Aaron Brown, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
Dharmendran Nair, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
Carone v. U.s.* 101 F.3d 707 10/31/96
U.S. v. Barnes* 101 F.3d 707 10/29/96
Deasey v. Crow* 101 F.3d 707 10/31/96
U.S. v. Childress** 101 F.3d 707 10/29/96
U.S. v. Scala*** 101 F.3d 707 11/06/96
Wyatt v. U.s 101 F.3d 707 11/07/96
Carroll v. Jordan Ashley, Inc.** 101 F.3d 707 10/29/96
Dallas v. U.s.* 101 F.3d 707 10/30/96
Smith v. U.s.* 101 F.3d 707 11/05/96
U.S. v. Williams* 101 F.3d 707 11/01/96
Vance J. Moriel, Petitioner-appellant, v. K.w. Prunty, Warden; Attorney General of the State Ofcalifornia, Respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Donald Shipman, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/15/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Refugia Marquez, A/k/a Cookie Marquez Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Herman Phillip Sheets, Jr., Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/15/96
Santiago Solorio-almanza, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 706 11/14/96
U.S. v. Koenig* 101 F.3d 707 11/06/96
Hurley v. E-systems, Inc.** 101 F.3d 707 11/07/96
U.S. v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of Fl** 101 F.3d 707 11/07/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Thomas L. Carufel, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
Santurino Paz-garcia, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 706 11/15/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert E. Merriweather, A/k/a James Cooper, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 704 11/14/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.kenneth Stewart, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles E. Wright, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 704 11/14/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.michael Welsh, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Excel Telecommunications and Patricia Seimears, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 704 11/13/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.josephine Murray, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Hoover Precision Products, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 704 11/13/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.robert Samuel Chappell, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 704 11/13/96
Plaintiff v. Defendant 101 F.3d 705 11/14/96
Kathy Avechuco, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of La Mesa; La Mesa Police Department; Waltermitchell; City of La Mesa Chief of Police; Johncarrigan; Officer, Individually and Asan Employee of City of Lamesa, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 705 11/14/96
David Leroy Cunningham, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Tana Wood; Ronald Smith, C/o; Andrews, C/o; Sgt.alvarado; Sgt. Frank, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.hardy Rivera, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee, 101 F.3d 704 11/14/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.stanley Priest, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States Parole Commission and John M. Hurley,respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 704 11/13/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Danny Lashund Jackson, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 703 11/14/96
Shelby Watts, Petitioner-appellant, v. E.l. Sparkman, Warden, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 703 11/14/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Ernest Winkelman, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 703 11/15/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Stanley J. Fuller, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 703 11/20/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Larry Beverly, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 704 11/13/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.gilbert W. Galvan, Petitioner-appellant, v. John M. Hurley, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 704 11/14/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James A. Thornton, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 704 11/14/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.lorenzo L. Stone-bey, Petitioner-appellant, v. H. Christian Debruyn, et al., Respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 704 11/14/96
Ralph Coleman, et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Pete Wilson, et al., Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 705 11/14/96
Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except when Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel 101 F.3d 705 03/29/95
American Medical International, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.,defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Joseph Balli Castillo, Petitioner-appellant, v. George Baldwin, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Richard L. James, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James River Paper Co., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporatecapacity, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Industrial Pacific, Ltd., Industrial Pacific Machine Works,inc., a Montana Corporation, Douglas C. Barrie,and Ted Lake, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Mitchell Harrell Jackson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Jerry A. O'rear, Sergeant; Lt. Branch; Cso Buffton; Cpofischer; Cso Neponen; Sgt. Severson; Cso Young;cso Meyer; Tom House, Deputy Warden,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Eugenio Rodriguez-salinas, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 706 11/13/96
Commonwealth Enterprises, a California Partnership;panorama Enterprises, a California Partnership;arthur Blech,defendants-counter-claimants-appellants, v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusettscorporation, Plaintiff-cross-defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc., Plaintiff/counter-defendant/appellant, v. Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.,defendant/counter-plaintiff/appellee 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Frank R. Borders, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joy K. Smucker, Individually and in Her Official Capacity Aspublic Defender for King County; Maureen M. Saylor,individually and in Her Official Capacity As Ma Director Ofwestern State Sex Offender Program; Lael Zealstroum,individually and in Her Official Capacity As Forensictherapist; Jacke Linda, Individually and in Her Officialcapacity As Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for King County;m.m. Vitals, Individually and in His Official Capacity Asclinical Director of Western State Sex Offender Program;mark Allen, Individually and in His Official Capacity Asforensic Therapist, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Delmis Gusman-fuentes, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 705 11/14/96
Louis Scherzer Partners Lp, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in Its Corporatecapacity, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 705 11/15/96
Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc., Plaintiff/counter-defendant/appellant, v. Bc Ethic Manufacturing Co., Inc.,defendant/counter-plaintiff/appellee 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Crescent Wharf and Warehouse Company; Stevedoring Servicesof America, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. the Vessel Cc San Francisco; Char Yigh Marine (panama)s.a., Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 705 11/14/96
John Heeney; Julie Heeney, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Mansfield Scientific, Inc.; Boston Scientific; Radionics,inc., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Interpool Limited, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Char Yigh Marine (panama) S.a.; Char Ching Marine (h.k.)co., Ltd., Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 705 11/14/96
David L. Hall, an Individual, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Labatt, a Foreign Corporation; Chef Francisco, Inc.,an Oregon Corporation; Charles Koenig, Jr., Anindividual, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Jay Frank, David Moule, Moule & Frank, Lawyers, Witnesses-appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee 101 F.3d 705 11/13/96
Shabazz v. Holt* 101 F.3d 707 10/31/96
U.S. v. Monaco* 101 F.3d 707 11/06/96
U.S. v. Preston* 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
May v. Fulton County, Georgia 101 F.3d 709 11/05/96
Casallas v. U.S. Attorney So. Dist.* 101 F.3d 709 11/08/96
Gelis v. U.s.* 101 F.3d 709 10/29/96
Duong v. Lomax* 101 F.3d 709 11/01/96
U.S. v. Garcia* 101 F.3d 709 11/05/96
Lamar v. Housing Authority/atlanta* 101 F.3d 709 11/05/96
U.S. v. Gates* 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
Coon v. Morrison* 101 F.3d 709 11/05/96
U.S. v. Snook*** 101 F.3d 709 11/06/96
U.S. v. Garces* 101 F.3d 708 11/05/96
Alfa Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Memory** 101 F.3d 708 11/07/96
Stewart v. Monley** 101 F.3d 708 11/07/96
Brown v. Sterling*** 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
Allen v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
Thomas v. Evans* 101 F.3d 709 10/29/96
U.S. v. Clyburn* 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
U.S. v. Cody* 101 F.3d 709 11/06/96
U.S. v. Gales*** 101 F.3d 709 10/30/96
U.S. v. Betts* 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
Springer v. Rrrb* 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
Easterday v. Gilbert* 101 F.3d 709 11/05/96
Russell v. Ins* 101 F.3d 709 11/01/96
U.S. v. Boehm* 101 F.3d 709 11/01/96
Starling v. Hughston Clinic, P.c 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
Wolfe v. Chater*** 101 F.3d 709 11/01/96
U.S. v. O'farrell* 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
Morrison v. Snow** 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
U.S. v. Vargas* 101 F.3d 709 10/30/96
Barrett v. Thornton* 101 F.3d 709 11/05/96
Cooper v. Unknown B.o.p. Employees* 101 F.3d 709 11/01/96
Amer. Bonding v. D & L Contractors* 101 F.3d 709 11/06/96
U.S. v. Trujillo* 101 F.3d 709 11/06/96
U.S. v. Scott* 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
U.S. v. Akujorobi*** 101 F.3d 709 10/31/96
Timber v. U.s.* 101 F.3d 709 11/06/96
U.S. v. Chotas* 101 F.3d 709 11/06/96
U.S. v. Webber* 101 F.3d 709 11/01/96
U.S. v. Evans*** 101 F.3d 708 11/08/96
Straubinger v. Christensen Gifts** 101 F.3d 708 11/08/95
Lewis v. Singletary*** 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
U.S. v. Morrison* 101 F.3d 708 10/30/96
U.S. v. Rolle* 101 F.3d 708 10/30/96
Hover v. Florida Power & Light Co.* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
U.S. v. Moore* 101 F.3d 708 11/08/96
Ballard v. Chater* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
Rocha v. Ins** 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
Pickens v. Singletary* 101 F.3d 708 10/30/96
Brown v. Genden* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
U.S. v. Rodriguez-diaz*** 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
U.S. v. Habeel* 101 F.3d 707 10/29/96
Harrison v. Chater* 101 F.3d 707 10/31/96
Hudson & Sons, Inc. v. U.S. Trustee 101 F.3d 707 10/31/96
Stouffer Hotel Co. v. Teachers Ins 101 F.3d 707 11/07/96
U.S. v. Solomon* 101 F.3d 707 10/30/96
U.S. v. Pelaez-gonzalez* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
U.S. v. Evans* 101 F.3d 708 10/30/96
Gardner v. Howell* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
U.S. v. Hickey* 101 F.3d 708 10/30/96
Stacey v. U.s.*** 101 F.3d 708 11/08/96
U.S. v. Baine* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
Guenther v. Young* 101 F.3d 708 11/05/96
U.S. v. Campblin* 101 F.3d 708 11/05/96
U.S. v. Rodriguez* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
Commander v. Lambdin* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
Wyatt v. Singletary* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
U.S. v. Dorsey* 101 F.3d 708 10/30/96
U.S. v. Geffrard* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
Van Poyck v. Metropolitan Dade Cty.* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
D'agostino v. U.s.* 101 F.3d 708 11/01/96
U.S. v. Zamorano* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
U.S. v. Geske* 101 F.3d 708 11/08/96
U.S. v. Mcinnis* 101 F.3d 708 11/06/96
U.S. v. Ramirez* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
U.S. v. Irizarry* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
Mitchell v. Singletary* 101 F.3d 708 10/31/96
Pittman v. Singletary* 101 F.3d 708 10/29/96
Mongoose Junction Ii v. Saja Cloth, Inc 101 F.3d 691 10/21/96
Leo N. Levitt, Ruth G. Levitt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 101 F.3d 691 10/22/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Wendy Lois Wells, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 370 11/27/96
Henry E. Vail, Petitioner, v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent 101 F.3d 37 12/06/96
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,416united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. J. Chandler Peterson, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 375 11/27/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Attique Ahmad, Aka Ed Ahmad, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 386 01/21/97
F.c. Schaffer & Associates, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Demech Contractors, Ltd., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 40 12/09/96
Canutillo Independent School District, Defendant-appellant, v. Martha Leija and Jerry Leija As Next Friends of Rosemarieleija, a Minor, Plaintiffs-appellees 101 F.3d 393 11/27/96
In Re Asbestos Litigation.james Flanagan; David H. Middleton; Edee Cochran; Estebanyanez Ortiz; John R. Allgood; Henry Williamevers; Lester Eugene Taylor; Safetynational Casualty Corporation, Appellants v. Gerald Ahearn; James Mcadams Dennis; Charles W. Jeep;james Drake; Juanita Drake; James Ellison; Rolanddearborn; Judith Dearborn; Kerwin Butcher, Dir., Workerscomp., Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs,u.s. Dept. of Labor; Paul Cochran; Ida Beck; Marionbehee; Longshore Intervenor; William James Mitchell;fibreboard Corporation; Bethlehem Steel Corporation;continental Casualty Company; Pacific Indemnity; Francismcgovern; Owens-illinois Inc.; Penn Mutual Life Insurancecompany; Columbia Casualty Company; Cna Casualty Companyof California; Celotex Corp.; Daniel Herman Rudd, Jr., Onbehalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated; Beverlywhite, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarlysituated; John Hansel, on Behalf of Themselves and Otherssimilarly Situated, Appellees 101 F.3d 368 12/03/96
Victor C. Baris, et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., et al., Defendants,caltex Petroleum, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 367 11/26/96
Wayne Harter; Robert Payne, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. C.d. Vernon, Individually and in His Official Capacity Assheriff of Rockingham County; Rockingham County,defendants-appellants,guilford County, Movant 101 F.3d 334 11/22/96
Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, a Municipalcorporation; Kurt L. Schmoke, in His Official Capacity Asmayor of Baltimore City; David Tanner, in His Officialcapacity As the General Superintendent of Zoningadministration and Enforcement of Baltimore City,defendants-appellees.the American Advertising Federation; the Americanassociation of Advertising Agencies; the Association Ofnational Advertisers, Incorporated; the Outdoor Advertisingassociation of America, Incorporated; Washington Legalfoundation; the City of Cincinnati, Ohio; the Marylandcongress of Parents & Teachers, Incorporated; the Coalitionfor Beautiful Neighborhoods; Baltimore City Wide Liquorcoalition for Better Laws and Regulations; City and Countyof San Francisco; City of San Jose; United States Ofamerica, Amici Curiae 101 F.3d 332 11/13/96
Linda Williams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Channel Master Satellite Systems, Incorporated; Channelmaster Communications, Incorporated; Avnet,incorporated, Defendants-appellees.equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Equal Employmentadvisory Council, Amici Curiae 101 F.3d 346 11/27/96
William Robinson, Plaintiff-appellee Cross-appellant, v. Global Marine Drilling Company, Defendant-appellant Cross-appellee 101 F.3d 35 11/25/96
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, Plaintiff-appellant,andunited States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Plaintiff, v. Jack D. Maness, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Josephl. Houska and Judy C. Houska, Defendant-appellee,andjoseph L. Houska; Judy C. Houska; Cenit Bank, F.s.b., Defendants.united States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Plaintiff-appellant,andamerican Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, Plaintiff, v. Jack D. Maness, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Josephl. Houska and Judy C. Houska, Defendant-appellee,andjoseph L. Houska; Judy C. Houska; Cenit Bank, F.s.b., Defendants.united States Fidelity & Guaranty Company; American Bankersinsurance Company of Florida, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Jack D. Maness, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Josephl. Houska and Judy C. Houska, Defendant-appellant,andjoseph L. Houska; Judy C. Houska; Cenit Bank, F.s.b., Defendants 101 F.3d 358 11/27/96
Robert J. Smith, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sylvia J. Reddy, Officer; Baltimore County, Maryland, Abody Corporate and Politic, Defendants-appellees.robert J. Smith, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sylvia J. Reddy, Officer; Baltimore County, Maryland, Abody Corporate and Politic, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 351 11/27/96
No. 95-60679 101 F.3d 414 12/12/96
Jerry Lee Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Wayne F. Mcelveen, Sheriff, in His Official Capacity, Etal., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 423 12/12/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bobby M. Keeton (95-6086) and Kim G. Davis (95-6087),defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 48 11/22/96
Nicholas Knapp, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Northwestern University, an Illinois Not-for-profitcorporation, and Rick Taylor, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 473 11/22/96
Arnold Cohn and Eleanor L. Cohn, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 486 11/22/96
Dr. Mark F. Alexander, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Rush North Shore Medical Center, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 487 02/07/97
Glenn L. Atchley, et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Heritage Cable Vision Associates, a Limited Partnership,d/b/a Tci of Michiana, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 495 11/26/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Edward L. Mims and Cleveland J. Mcdade, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 494 11/25/96
Michael D. Veilleux, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Jeffrey Perschau, Detective for the Manchester Policedepartment, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 1 11/20/96
Robin Ray Doddy; Jeanette W. Doddy, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Oxy Usa, Inc.; Occidental Petroleum Corporation; Petrolitecorporation; Treatolite-petrolite Company; Treatolitechemicals; Nalco Chemical Co., Also Known As Nalco Chemicalcompany Inc.; Bolt Fuel Oil Company Inc.; Pride Petroleumservices, Also Known As Pride Petroleum Services Inc.;baker Hughes Incorporated, Also Known As Baker Hughesincorporated; Baker Hughes Oil Field Operation Inc.,formerly Known As Baker Hughes Production Tools; Bakerperformance Chemicals Inc.; Baker Performance Chemicals;baker Performance Chemicals Incorporated; Pool Wellservicing, Also Known As Pool Company (texas) Inc.; Thewestern Company, Also Known As Western Company of Northamerica; Halliburton Company, Also Known As Halliburtonspecial Products, Also Known As Halliburton Services; Ancorservices Inc., Also Known As Asi Inc., Also Known As Asi;billy Don Thomas, Individually and As Agent; Mark D.johnson, Individually and As Agent; Paul Painter,individually and As Trustee; Central Title Company; Hartengineering Company; Pool Well Servicing; Pool Company(texas) Inc.; Halliburton Services; Halliburton Specialproducts; Pride Petroleum Services Inc., Defendants-appellees,trident Ngl Inc., Movant-appellee 101 F.3d 448 12/18/96
Kenneth Ikerd, Individually and on Behalf of His Minorchild, Laura Ikerd; Sharon Ikerd, Individuallyand on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Lauraikerd, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Duane Blair, Sheriff; Harold Varnado, Deputy Sheriff,incorrectly Sued As Ray Varnado; Roy Stevens,deputy Sheriff, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 430 11/15/95
Lloyds of London, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant, v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation,defendant-counter-claimant-appellee 101 F.3d 425 12/12/96
In the Matter of Larson C. Locklin, Debtor.jacob C. Pongetti, Trustee for the Estate of Larson Locklin, Appellant, v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Appellee 101 F.3d 435 12/16/96
52 Soc.sec.rep.ser. 169, Medicare & Medicaid Guidep 44,900richard Levin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Masten Childers, Ii, Medicaid Commissioner and Secretary Ofthe Cabinet for Human Resources, Commonwealth Ofkentucky, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 44 11/20/96
Bobby Lee Lindsey, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 444 12/18/96
Anheuser-busch, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Kurt L. Schmoke, in His Official Capacity As Mayor Ofbaltimore City; Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City;city Council of Baltimore City; David Tanner, in Hisofficial Capacity As the General Superintendent of Zoningadministration and Enforcement, Defendants-appellees,andjohn Joseph Curran, Attorney General of the State Ofmaryland, in His Official Capacity, Defendant.the Association of National Advertisers, Incorporated; Theamerican Association of Advertising Agencies; the Mediainstitute; National Association of Broadcasters; Thethomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Freeexpression; Washington Legal Foundation; Center Forscience in the Public Interest; Coalition for Beautifulneighborhoods; Baltimore City Wide Liquor Coalition Forbetter Laws and Regulations, Amici Curiae.penn Advertising of Baltimore, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, a Municipalcorporation, Defendant-appellee,andjohn Joseph Curran, Attorney General of the State Ofmaryland, in His Official Capacity, Defendant.the Association of National Advertisers, Incorporated; Theamerican Association of Advertising Agencies; the Mediainstitute; National Association of Broadcasters; Thethomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Freeexpression; Washington Legal Foundation; Center Forscience in the Public Interest; Coalition for Beautifulneighborhoods; Baltimore City Wide Liquor Coalition Forbetter Laws and Regulations, Amici Curiae 101 F.3d 325 11/13/96
287 Corporate Center Associates, Appellant, v. the Township of Bridgewater, a Municipal Corporation of Thestate of New Jersey 101 F.3d 320 11/27/96
72 Fair Empl.prac.cas. (bna) 1232,69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,385stanley J. Jakubiak, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 23 11/18/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Joshua Arriaga, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 229 12/10/95
United States of America, Appellee, v. Anthony Chukwura, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 230 11/26/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Mohammed Fagge, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 232 11/25/96
Bruce Smith, As Personal Representative of Ingrid Smith,deceased and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated;paul S. Hudson, Personal Representative of the Estate Ofmelina K. Hudson, Deceased; Bruce D. Abbott; et al.,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya; Libyan Externalsecurity Organization, Also Known As Jamahiriyasecurity Organization; Libyan Arabairlines, Defendants-appellees,abdel Basset Ali Al-megrahi, Also Known As Abdelbaset Alimohmed, Also Known As Adbelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi, Alsoknown As Mr. Baset, Also Known As Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad,also Known As Abd Al-basit Al-magrahi, and Lamen Khalifafhimah, Also Known As al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, Also Known Asmr. Lamin, Defendants 101 F.3d 239 02/10/97
Doreen Pino, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Raymond Locascio, Defendant,new York Hospital, Cornell Medical Center, Westchesterdivision, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 235 11/25/96
72 Fair Empl.prac.cas. (bna) 975,69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,489maria De Los Angeles Sanchez, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos Alvarado, et al., Defendants, Appellees 101 F.3d 223 12/30/96
Maryann E. Lawton, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. State Mutual Life Assurance Company of America, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 218 12/02/96
Amy Cohen, et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Brown University, et al., Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 155 11/21/96
Jerome D. Jackson, Appellant, v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, et al., Appellees 101 F.3d 145 12/06/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Anthony Edwards, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 17 11/22/96
United States of America, Appellant, v. Brian A. Pettiford, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 199 11/25/96
United States, Appellee, v. Brian Smith, Defendant, Appellant.united States, Appellee, v. Gerald Yanovitch, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 202 11/26/96
Lawrence M. Farkas, Plaintiff-appellant,joseph M. Aemisego; Anthony R. Alfano; Jose Almeida;charles Anderson; Mike Antonucci; Richard Arroyo; Johnbarone; Lawrence Bischofsberger; Richard Bottari; Andrej. Brown; John Calabro; George A. Calandrino; Petecapuano; R. Caserta; Vincent Castronuovo; Thomas Clark;marvin Clausell; Jerome D'aguiar; Peter Dalton; Nickdefeis; Salvatore Demaria; Joseph Depaso; Donalddickinson; Augustine Disalvo; Jose J. Escobar; Lawrencej. Faughnan; John Feltham; Chet Flower; Wilfred Foster;michael Foti; Robert Galassi; Frank J. Gallagher; John I.gerace; George A. Gerhens; William Germann; Michael Gold;john M. Guido; Kenneth Hampton; William Harrington;brian Harrison; Gerard Hart; Charles A. Hendricks;santiago Hernandez; Larry Hollenbeck; Raymond Hoye; Bobhyland; Cornelio Iacono; Chester Jabacinski; Walterjacome; Lehman Jenkins; Robert Johnson; John Jones; Johnc. Richards, Jr.; Clifton Oates, Jr.; Manfred Kalkowski;charles J. Keller; John Kleppe; Anthony J. Lafemina; Paulf. Lehnert; Michael v. Lynch; Eddie Maddox; Williammaffei; Dominick Manocchi; Rey A. Martinez; Michaelmartorano; Michael Matraia; Joseph Mcdermott; Robertmcdermott; Delmar Miner; Ronald Montanya; Robertomorales; Patrick Moriarty; Gregory Nesmith; Russellnoble; Daniel J. O'leary; Michael P. Oakes; Antonioortega; John Pertoso; Allan Petre; Louis A. Picciola;faublas Pierre; Gary Raffa; Michaeljohn Regan; Michael J.regan; Peter Renda; David Roberts; Jose Rogel; Franciscop. Roman; William Salvato; Carmine Salvato; Bernardscheurer; Marvin Seigal; Mitchell Singer; Shawn Smith;david W. Smith; Angelo Spadaro; Frank Spinella; Thomas J.staropoli; Richard Stvan; Floyd Swehla; Richard Leetaylor; Michael Tetro; Leon Thomas; John Tindal; Mitchturner; Juan R. Del Villar; Barry Wasserman; Paul Witte;james Zieran; and John Zoccolillo, Plaintiffs, v. Anthony Rumore, Individually and in His Official Capacity Aspresident of Soft Drink and Brewery Workers Union,local 812, International Brotherhood Ofteamsters, Defendant,soft Drink and Brewery Workers Union, Local 812,international Brotherhood of Teamsters; Thecoca-cola Bottling Company of New York,inc., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 20 11/22/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. John Frank Rodgers, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 247 11/27/96
In Re Palm Coast, Matanza Shores Limited Partnership, Aconnecticut Limited Partnership, Debtor.united States Trustee, Appellant, v. Marvin J. Bloom, Trustee, Appellee 101 F.3d 253 11/27/96
Elaine Goldwater, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Metro-north Commuter Railroad, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 296 12/02/96
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. the H.p. Townsend Manufacturing Co., a Subsidiary of Comtec,inc.; Tce Corporation; Mt Assembly Corporation;kimberley P. Barrett; Richard B.barrett; and David M. Somers,respondents 101 F.3d 292 12/02/96
Satcorp International Group and Sino American Trading Corp.,plaintiffs-appellees, v. China National Silk Import & Export Corporation, Defendant,andhugh H. Mo, Esq., Appellant 101 F.3d 3 11/19/96
Joseph Tourangeau, Molly Cobbol, Robert Lowell and Robertfrank, on Behalf of Themselves and All Otherssimilarly Situated,plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants, v. Uniroyal, Inc., Defendant-appellee,joseph F. Flannery, Individually and As Chief Executiveofficer and Director of Uniroyal, Inc.; William J. Palmer,thomas W. Clark, Norma R. Sullivan, Alan R. Elton, Ronald H.hawkins and Frank J. Longto, Individually and As Members Ofthe Uniroyal Board of Benefits and Awards, Defendants,michelin North America, Inc. (formerly Uniroyal Goodrichtire Company, Inc.) Respondent-appellant-cross-appellee 101 F.3d 300 12/03/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Reginald B. Gist, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 32 11/22/96
Estate of Rose D'ambrosio, Deceased, Vita D'ambrosio,executrix, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service 101 F.3d 309 11/26/96
72 Fair Empl.prac.cas. (bna) 801,69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,409nicanor A. Briones, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 287 12/02/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Alexander Cruz-rojas A/k/a Alexander Rojas-cruz; Reinaldonarvaez-maisonet A/k/a Reinaldo Maisonet-narvaez,defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 283 11/29/96
Daniel Chill, Plaintiff-appellant,paul Kay, Giza Schectman, Mayer Ballas, Douglas Marshall,steven J. Weiss, M.d. Profit Sharing Plan Andmichelle Ruder, Appellants, v. General Electric Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 263 11/27/96
Warnervision Entertainment Inc., Plaintiff-counterdefendant-appellee, v. Empire of Carolina, Inc., Empire Industries, Inc., Empiremanufacturing, Inc. and Thomas Lowe Ventures, Inc.d/b/a Playing Mantis,defendants-counterclaimants-appellants 101 F.3d 259 11/27/96
In Re Lehal Realty Associates, Debtor.george Lebovits, a Principal and Equity Holder of Lehalrealty Associates, Debtor-appellant, v. John F. Scheffel, As Trustee of Lehal Realty Associates,trustee-appellee 101 F.3d 272 11/27/96
United States Court of Appeals,second Circuit 101 F.3d 278 11/27/96
Hughes Christensen Company, Petitioner-cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 28 11/20/96
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County, Plaintiff-appellee, v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al., Defendants.appeal of Village of Bartlett and Citizens Against Thebalefill, Petitioners to Intervene As Defendants,appellants 101 F.3d 503 11/26/96
52 Soc.sec.rep.ser. 244, Unempl.ins.rep. (cch) P 15637bcynthia Jones, for Ivory B. Jones, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 509 11/26/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Norman L. Brooks, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 680 12/03/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.maureen F. Frechette, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Paul Ruane, et al., Defendants, Appellees 101 F.3d 680 12/03/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.ramon Santana-paredes, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Hilton International of Puerto Rico, Inc., Defendant, Appellant.il Giardino, Inc., et al., Defendants, Appellees 101 F.3d 680 12/03/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.elizabeth v. Bogosian, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Mercedes-benz of North America, Inc. and Daimler-benz Northamerica Corporation, Defendants, Appellees 101 F.3d 680 11/21/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Douglas M. Burke, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 680 12/02/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.angel M. Diaz-zayas, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 680 12/03/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Rufino Santos, A/k/a El Filipino, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 680 11/26/96
Yoganand Premachandra, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 68 11/21/96
Ellis Wayne Felker, Petitioner, v. Tony Turpin, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classificationcenter, Respondent 101 F.3d 657 11/14/96
First Savings Bank, F.s.b., Plaintiff-appellant, v. First Bank System, Inc.; First Bank, F.s.b., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 645 11/27/96
Mourad Abu Remileh, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 66 10/30/96
Darryl Richardson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.e. Miller, D.b.a. C.e. Miller Freight & Seafood; Raymondf. Sims, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 665 12/16/96
Thomas J. Faust, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 675 01/21/97
Murphy Exploration & Production Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Oryx Energy Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 670 11/22/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.fred L. Murray, Jr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Trans Union Corporation, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 680 12/03/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Armondo Johntel Cole, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 680 12/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.rufus Jones, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.albert Tantalo, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee 101 F.3d 681 05/20/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.gerald R. Edsell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Independent Freightways, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. William Michael Rivers, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.theodore M. Black, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mario Cuomo; Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Commissioner of Thenys Dept. of Correctional Services; Ronald Miles; Robertj. Mccelellan, Superintendent; W. Cuer, Deputy Supt. Forsecurity; Carol Hayden; Sargent C. West; Dr. Milagrosmejillano, Riddick, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. William Titus Jones, Aka Titus, Aka Ty, Aka Baby Boy; Alvinsistrunk, Aka Triz; Robert Cobb; Sandra Vernon,aka Lulu; Rossan Roy Cardillo, Aka X.roy, Defendants,nancy Jones; Harry Jones, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Diego Enrique Delgado-saenz; Jose Ivan Restrepo; Ricardofonseca, Also Known As Carlos, Also Known Ascarlucci, Defendants,ramon Ramirez, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.charles A. Coleman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United Statespostal Service, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/10/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Juan Aguilar-aguilar, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 680 12/05/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.scott Philip Brooker, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Commissioner, Nh Department of Corrections, et al.,defendants, Appellees 101 F.3d 680 11/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.dennis Powell, Petitioner-appellant, v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/03/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Dwayne Henderson, Also Known As James Gordon, Also Known Asjames Green; Pamela Franklin, Also Known No.95-1439 As Samantha Ferguson, Also Knownas Demetria Grant, Defendants,damilola Odumosu, Also Known As Carl James, Also Known Aslola Also Known As Calvin Dickens, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.fred Schneider, Petitioner-appellant, v. Burton T. Ryan, Jr., Joseph G. Gregory, Edgardo M.tolentino, Allan Shurack, Respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Continental Trend Resources, Inc.; Harold G. Hamm, Trusteeof the Harold G. Hamm Revocable Inter Vivos Trust; Gary H.wright; Cindy Wright; Jeffrey B. Hume; and Farrar Oilcompany, Plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants, v. Oxy Usa Inc., Defendant-appellant/ Cross-appellee 101 F.3d 634 11/26/96
Kathleen E. Berna, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Securityadministration,* Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 631 11/26/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Shon Michael Pierson, Appellant 101 F.3d 545 01/03/97
Chris Myers, Jr., David Allen Sheldon, and Kurtis D.strohbehn, Appellants, v. Thomas Hundley, Ruth Mcvay, Jim Helling, John Emmett, Debbienichols, Mike Anderson, Ron Welder, and Sallyhalford, Appellees 101 F.3d 542 11/27/96
Young America, Inc., Appellee, v. Union Central Life Insurance Company, Appellant 101 F.3d 546 11/29/96
Scott Fetzer Company, Kirby Company Division, Appellant/cross-appellee, v. Stan Williamson, Doing Business As the Vacuum Doctor,appellee/cross-appellant 101 F.3d 549 11/29/96
United States of America, Appellant, v. Virgil Owens, Appellee 101 F.3d 559 01/02/97
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Fred A. Friend, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 557 11/29/96
Leroy S. Seiler, Appellee, v. John A. Thalacker, Appellant 101 F.3d 536 01/02/97
52 Soc.sec.rep.ser. 250, Unempl.ins.rep. (cch) P 15620bdiana Dodson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of the Social Securityadministration, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 533 11/25/96
Sherrylen Weiler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Household Finance Corporation, a Delaware Corporation,household International Company, a Delawarecorporation, and Terrence Skorupka,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 519 11/27/96
Donald Pasqua, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 514 11/26/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Floyd Elodius Cotton, Sr., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 52 11/15/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Clinton S. Parker, Also Known As Spanky, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 527 12/02/96
Nmc Finishing, Doing Business As Nickell Moulding, Inc.,petitioner/cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 528 12/02/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Jack Conrad Choate, Appellant 101 F.3d 562 01/24/97
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gregory Lee Melina, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 567 11/29/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Tenorio Sablan, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 618 11/15/96
Gaya Prasad, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 614 12/03/96
In Re John Jeffrey Peters, Debtor.mason-mcduffie Mortgage Corporation, Appellant, v. John Jeffrey Peters, Appellee 101 F.3d 618 11/25/96
Pete Benavidez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Albuquerque, City Of; Lawrence Rael, Chief Administrativeofficer, in His Official Capacity, Defendants-appellees;robert H. Smith, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Albuquerque, City Of; Lawrence Rael, Chief Administrativeofficer, in His Official Capacity, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 620 11/14/96
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Fru-con Construction Corporation and Fru-con Engineeringinc., Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 63 01/02/97
Ronald Ray Reid, Petitioner-appellant, v. State of Oklahoma, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 628 11/25/96
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8367, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 13,961alyeska Pipeline Service Company; Amerada Hess Pipelinecorporation; Arco Pipeline Company; Bp Pipelines, Inc.;exxon Pipeline Company; Mobil Alaska Pipeline Company;phillips Alaska Pipeline Corporation; Alyeska Pipelineservice Company; Sohio Alaska Pipeline Co.; Unocalpipeline Company, Plaintiffs-appellees,andstate of Alaska, Plaintiff-intervenor-appellee, v. Kluti Kaah Native Village of Copper Center, Defendant,andcopper Center Village Council; Nicholas Lincoln,individually and As President of the Copper Center Villagecouncil; Cathy Mcconkey, Individually and As Copper Centervillage Administrator; Bernie Martin, Individually and Ascommissioner of the Copper Center Village Tax Commission;phyllis Yazzie, Individually and As Commissioner of Thecopper Center Village Tax Commission; Lidia Selkregg,individually and As Commissioner of the Copper Centervillage Tax Commission, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 610 11/20/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ronnell B. Randolph; Willie Mitchell, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 607 12/03/96
Delores Harmon, Individually and As Executrix of the Estateof Ralph Harmon, Appellee/cross-appellant, v. United States of America, Acting Through the Farmers Homeadministration, United States Department of Agriculture;thomas A. Lloyd, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Dallas Tonsager,state Director of the Farmers Home Administration,appellants/cross-appellees.delores Harmon, Individually and As Executrix of the Estateof Ralph Harmon, Appellant, v. United States of America, Acting Through the Farmers Homeadministration, United States Department of Agriculture;thomas A. Lloyd, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Dallas Tonsager,state Director of the Farmers Home Administration, Appellees 101 F.3d 574 12/02/96
Guaranty National Title Company, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. J.e.g. Associates, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 57 11/15/96
Samuel Lee Mcdonald, Appellant, v. Michael Bowersox, Appellee 101 F.3d 588 01/23/97
Daniel Robert Schluga, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Milwaukee, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 60 11/18/96
In Home Health, Inc., Appellant, v. the Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellee 101 F.3d 600 01/02/97
Mary Ellen Jannsen, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Judith v. Condo, Director of Albany County Rape Crisiscenter, and County of Albany, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 14 11/22/96
Teresa Ambrosini, et al., Appellants, v. Jorge Labarraque and the Upjohn Company, Appellees 101 F.3d 129 12/06/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.anthony Bernardi, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.maureen Cuomo, by Her Guardian and Mother Mary Cuomo,plaintiff-appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health Andhuman Services, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.keith L. Desanto, Petitioner, v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent 101 F.3d 108 03/22/96
U.S. v. Reyes 101 F.3d 108 03/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.victor R. Polewsky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Social Security Administration, Department of Health Andhuman Services, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.patricia Rogers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York State, Disciplinary Committee, Supreme Court,appellate Division, First Judicial Department,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Juan Rosado, Aka Apache; Reynaldo Santos, Aka Juice; Juanviruet, Aka Phil, Aka Seaweb, Aka Fil; Raymond Crespo, Akatony; Josue Barreto, Aka Josh; Luis Andino, Aka Gq, Akalou; Jamie Renae Torado, Aka Rene, Aka Van Dam; Gilbert-otorres; Jose Polanco; Alfredo San Miguel, Aka Miguel, Defendants,ignacio Morales, Aka Flaco, Melvin "heavy" Brown, Aka Heavy;michael Arroyo, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 107 03/04/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jonathan Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.o. Mcalinn, C.o. Carey, and C.o. Staviski, Defendants-appellees.nurse Miles, Defendant 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Moorthy S. Ram, Aka Srinivasan Ramamoorthy, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.atrium Plaza Health Care Center, Inc., Petitioner-cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Thomas Vogelsang, Defendant-appellant,patricia Carson, Defendant 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.tyheem Y. Allah, Also Known As Tyheem Mills, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Walter Fogg, Superintendent, and Herbert Mclaughlin, Deputysuperintendent, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
In Re Peter Shue 101 F.3d 107 03/05/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.lawrence P. Strouse, Jr., Petitioner-appellant, v. Arthur A. Leonardo, Sup't., Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Pedro Enrique Perez-rodriguez, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 108 03/20/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Melvin Pinckney and Fundador Cuevas, Also Known Aspowerhouse, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 108 03/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Richard T. Strother, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 108 03/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.radha R.m. Narumanchi; Mohan L. Mehta, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Michael J. Adanti; Frank E. Harrison, I/o; Eugene Dixon;paul Wenger; David C. Newton, I/o; Barbara Bard; Frank E.muska; Jerry Bannister, I/o; Michael Pernal, I/o; Dorisgriscom; James Munz; Joseph Mckeon; Irene Glasser; Lewisjones; Richard Fahringer, I/o; Wafeek Abdelsayed, I/o;doris Granatowski, I/o; Stewart Solomon, I/o; Martha F.o'hara, I/o; Connecticut State University, Board Oftrustees; Connecticut State University; American Assoc. Ofuniversity Professors; John 1-3 Dow; Jane 1-3 Dow,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/20/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.larriel Diggs, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Eastman Kodak Co., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.s.c. Fertile, Re v. , Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ed Mcmahon and American Family Publishers, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Rudolph Santobello and Charles Desalvo, Also Known Ascharlie, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 108 03/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.hartford Hospital, Petitioner, Cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, Cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 108 03/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john J. Mccarthy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Francis Teta, Director of Classification, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.francis Bove, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Brian M. Kennedy, Trooper, As an Individual and in Hisofficial Capacity, Defendant-appellant,john And/or Jane Doe, Being and Intending to Be Policeofficer(s), Public Servants And/or Employees Ofthe State of New York, Defendant 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.calvin L. Shoemaker, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of California; New York State; City of New York;cbs, Inc.; American Broadcasting Company, Inc. (abc);cable News Network, Inc. (cnn); National Broadcastingcompany, Inc. (nbc), Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ann Mitchell-angel, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Beth Cronin; John Toledo; Samuel Schloss; Santa Schloss;ohel Children's Home; Corporation Counsel Kendrick; Newyork City Department of Social Services; Child Welfareadministration; Jenny Leifer; Jesus Rivera; Louis Brown,officer, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
In Re Forbes 101 F.3d 108 03/19/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.fred M. Anderson, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Luis Rodriguez, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 108 03/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.william Monroig, Petitioner-appellant, v. Louis Mann, Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Kola Noibi, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Antonio Cordova Gonzalez, A/k/a Poti, A/k/a El Viejo,defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 11/18/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.ljubica Rajkovic, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Laverde's Market, Inc., et al., Defendants, Appellees 101 F.3d 106 11/14/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Hilda Brown, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 03/25/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.joseph G. Vecchio, Jr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Angelo Lamonica, Individually and As Chief of Police of Thewinthrop Police Department, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 106 10/17/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.in Re Robert J. Spenlinhauer, Debtor.robert J. Spenlihauer, Appellant, v. Spencer Press, Inc., Appellee 101 F.3d 106 11/14/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.charles Langone et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. William Walsh, Inc., D/b/a William Walsh Movers, Defendant,appellant.charles Langone et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. William Walsh, Inc., D/b/a William Walsh Movers, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 11/20/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Rony E. Orellana, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 11/14/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Eladio Camacho, Jr., A/k/a David Richard, A/k/a Hectorperez, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 11/13/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States of America, Appellee, v. Stanley Prou, Defendant, Appellant.united States of America, Appellee, v. Raheam Johnson, Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 11/20/96
Walter E. Durling, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Spectrum Furniture Company, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 100 11/18/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.amador Irizarry-sanabria, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 106 11/18/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.earl Braxton, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. City of Providence, et al., Defendants, Appellees 101 F.3d 106 11/19/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.chukwu E. Azubuko, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Board of Directors, British Airways, Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 106 11/14/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.juan Moises Perez-mendez, Petitioner, Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent, Appellee 101 F.3d 106 11/13/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States of America, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. the One-sixth Share of James J. Bulger in All Present Andfuture Proceeds of Registered in the Name Ofmichael Linskey, Defendant, Appellee.jean Holland, Claimant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 11/13/96
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.federal Financial Group, Inc., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Charles E. Serra, Jr., A/k/a Charles Serra, Jr., Defendant, Appellant 101 F.3d 106 11/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.somerset Marine, Inc., A/s/o Central National Gottesman,inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. M/v "amer Shanti," M/v "silver Star," Their Engines, Tackle,boilers, Etc., Massan Shipping Industries Inc.,defendants-appellants,andtrevose Shipping Co., Ltd., Defendant 101 F.3d 107 03/04/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.evelyn A. Scott and Leon Scott, Plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees, v. the Dime Savings Bank of New York, Fsb,defendant-appellee-cross-appellant 101 F.3d 107 03/05/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.robert Greenspan, D.d.s., P.c., Petitioner-cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 107 03/05/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.giovanni Rodriguez, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.johnny Oyola, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Dan Austin, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.einhorn Yaffee Prescott Architecture & Engineering, P.c.,plaintiff-appellant. v. J. Louis Turpin; Prhinebeck Architecture & Planning P.c.;john A. Missell, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 107 03/05/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jose Migel Corona-diaz, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
U.S. v. Williams 101 F.3d 107 03/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.duquiero Higita, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/04/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.antonio Cruz, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.alberto Quinones, Petitioner-appellant, v. R.j. Mcclellan, Superintendent, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated; Drexel Burnham Lambertgroup Inc.; Michael R. Milken; Lowell J. Milken; Cary J.maultasch; Pamela R. Monzert; Steven N. Posner;pennsylvania Engineering Corporation, Defendants,victor Posner, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 107 03/08/96
In Re Emily Distaj 101 F.3d 108 03/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.sumner M. Rosen, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ronald A. Feldman and Columbia University, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/14/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.delbert Mimms, Petitioner-appellant, v. al C. Parke,1 Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 110 11/08/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.sharon L. Nelson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 110 11/08/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.paul Kenneth Caston, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 110 10/25/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.charles B. Dietzen, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Mork, John P. Snider, and Waupaca County,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 110 10/25/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.amgen, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kidney Center of Delaware County, Limited, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 110 10/28/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.michael C. Antonelli, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dan T. Fugett, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 110 11/01/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Frank E. Abbott, Also Known As Eddie, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 110 10/28/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.christopher Young, Plaintiff-appellant, v. L. Garb, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 110 10/31/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.diane Hackett, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Cornell University, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.alonzo Spencer Owens, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bellevue Hospital Center, Nyc Health and Hospitals Corp.,and the City of New York, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.gilbert Gonzalez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sgt. Napolitano, Edward Trennes, P.o., Defendants-appellees,police Officers of the 43rd Precinct, Misael Rodriguez,p.o., Defendants 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.alexander Salerno, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Joel Proyect, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 11 11/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.benton K. Moon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Adler, and His Manager of Internal Revenue Service,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/28/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.frank L. Polk, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Cook County Department of Corrections and Jail Guard Robles,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 110 10/31/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David B. Wolf, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 110 11/01/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.david L. King, Petitioner-appellant, v. Jack Duckworth, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 110 11/04/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.james E. Williams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Anthony Ramos, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 110 10/25/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.joseph Deerwester, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Steve Brienen, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 110 11/04/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.robert Vines, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dan Buchler, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 110 10/31/96
Castro County, Texas, Appellee, v. Joe Crespin, Appellant 101 F.3d 121 12/06/96
Trident Seafoods, Inc., Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent 101 F.3d 111 11/26/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kareem Abdul Jabar Walker, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 110 11/01/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.alfonso Soto, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 110 11/12/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (khan), Petitioner-appellant, v. Judy Smith, Respondent-appellee.* 101 F.3d 110 10/24/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.ruby D. Lachica, M.d., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Medical College of Wisconsin, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 110 01/10/97
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.fredrick R. Hannah, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Jerry D. Gilmore, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 110 10/31/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.richard Hockenberry, Petitioner-appellant, v. George Detella, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center,respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 110 10/25/96
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.james M. Debardeleben, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Patrick W. Keohane, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 110 11/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ralph Mitchell, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department Oflabor, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.richard F. Felker, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Pepsi-cola Co. and Pepsico, Inc., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/28/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.assunta Saglioccolo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York City Municipal Corporation, Department of Financebureau of Tax Collection of the City of New York,commissioner of Finance; Department of Housing Preservationand Development of the City of New York, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.resat S. Keles, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Yale University; Katepalli R. Sreenivasan, Dr.; Garyhaller, Dr., Defendant-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.evaristo Rosario, Plaintiff-appellant, v. J.w. Tippy, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Jairo Alvarez-buitrago and Ivan Alvarez-buitrago, Defendants.guillermo Leon-lopez, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.genrikh Vapne, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Postal Service, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.linda Gonzalez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc., D/b/a Binhamtonpress Company; and Jan Sprawls, As an Agent Andemployee of Gannett Satelliteinformation Network, Inc.,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.sidney Epstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Federal Communications Commission, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Derek Williams, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 108 03/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john P. Bigda, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant, v. Fischbach Corporation, Defendant-counter-claimaint-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.eugene Celli and Wendy Liu, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Metro-north Commuter Railroad and Metropolitantransportation Authority, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jesus Palta, Defendant-appellant,edison A. Marolejo, Defendant 101 F.3d 108 03/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.action Temporaries Management Company, Inc.,plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant, v. Stratmar Systems, Inc., Defendant-appellant-cross-appellee 101 F.3d 108 03/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.c. Gerardo Rojas, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Tai Shan Kang, Ye Mai Kang, and Hwa Lin Tai, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 108 03/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john E. Lucas, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Oxigene, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 109 09/05/95
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jean Yasu Ishikawa, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the City of New York, Department of Cultural Affairs,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 109 03/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.roland Horton and Helen Horton, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Corning, Incorporated; Katherine Funk, Enrico Giannone,individually and As Employee of Corning, Inc.,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/27/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.james J. Larkin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Town of West Hartford, and Both Individually and in Theirofficial Capacities, Barry Feldman; Michaelparker; James Francis; Josephfioretti, Laurie Murray;patricia Gray, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23 101 F.3d 109 08/03/95
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.dorothy A, Palaimo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Lutz, Thomas Elthorp, Michael Slade, and St. Elizabethhospital, Defendants-appellees,andjames Jecko, John E. Shaw, As Justice of the Town of Marcy,and Donald Buttonshon, As Justice of the Town Ofmarcy, Defendants 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. John Edward Goodsier, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.mary Moore, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, and the United States Socialsecurity Administration, As an Agency of Theunited States of America, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Darien Pughe, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.arthur N. Bernklau, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.joseph Colasanto, D/b/a Allied Home Inspections and Michaela. Delugan, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. United States of America and Henry Cisneros, Secretary,housing and Urban Development, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.in Re Max Wendel and Linda Wendel,manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Max Wendel and Linda Wendel, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 109 03/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.mitch Paulsen, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Andrew Nesselroth, Mike Plunkett and John Derienzo, Plaintiffs, v. the County of Nassau, Nassau County Veterans Memorialcoliseum and Facility Management of New York,inc., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Estate of George Hirshberg, Alan Hirshberg, Walter Herzberg,saul Listokin, Norman Stein, David Lev, Defendants,israel G. Grossman, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.joshua D. Berry, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Susan v. Demers, John E. Robitzek, Robert Tengeler, Antoner. Silva, Raul A. Tabora, Jr., and Hollyhartstone, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 109 03/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. John Jairo Henao, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Jan Bocian, Also Known As Jan Gramo, Petitioner-appellant, v. Salvador Godinez, Warden, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 465 11/21/96
Michael J.h. Brist v. County of Delaward, Borough of Darby 101 F.3d 689 10/30/96
Kenneth Clement, Florentino Perez, Boris Harris, Gregoryhill, A/k/a John Hall, Walter Scott, Mary Fleming, Orlandoeast, Robert Willis, Samuel C. Stretton, Esq., Teresa Carrdeni, Esq., George Newman, Esq., Irene Cotton, Esq. v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Honorableedward J. Bradley, Honorable Edward Blake, Honorable W.wilson Goode, City of Philadelphia, City Council Ofphiladelphia, Honorable Robert Casey, Governor, General Assembly 101 F.3d 689 10/23/96
Milton J. Conklin, Jr. v. James Gorman, John Summers, Bryan White, Unknown Defendants,all As Prison Guards 101 F.3d 689 10/23/96
Paul T. Debruyn v. D. Shepherd, As Dentist, D. Malinov, As Doctor, M.fedorowicz, Associate Warden of Operations All Off.c.i. Schuylkill 101 F.3d 689 10/22/96
Peter C. Adams, Katherine Adams, Co-administrators of Estateof Christopher M. Adams, on Behalf of Decedents's Estate v. City of Philadelphia, Richard Neal, Police Commissioner,george Holcombe, Police Officer, Badge #5538, 39th District 101 F.3d 689 10/11/96
R. George Dandar v. Robert Walker, As an Officer-lieutenant Walker (security) Atscip, Andrew Domovich, As Warden Scip 101 F.3d 689 10/21/96
George Rahsaan Brooks-bey v. Ned Sutliff, David Larkins, Paul F. Crisler, E. Kneiss 101 F.3d 689 10/29/96
Reginald Boyer v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, John M. Mccullough, Francis Dougherty,sam Mazzotta, Stewart E. Boone, Anthony J. Deangelo, Johndoe, T.l. Whitman, George H. Conrad, Former Hearingexaminer, Daniel Hammond, Correctional Officer (co 4), Jackm. Allar, Former Assistant Supt, & Grievance Coordinator,george Wilson, Corrections Mail Inspector, D. Leathers,correctional Officer (#4), at Sci-rockview 101 F.3d 689 10/23/96
Coopers and Lybrand, a Partnership, Phar-mor,inc.,westinghouse Credit Corporation, First Westinghousecapital Corporation, Giant Eagle of Delaware, Inc., Samuell. Amodeo, Allen Apter, Marcella Apter, Joseph Apter,clinical Cardiology Associates Pension Plan and Profitsharing Trusts, Joseph R. Faccenda, Robert A. Goldstein,m.d., Raymond A. Huber, Edward J. Lewis, Joy D. Magrish,trustee of Trusts for Amy E. Magrish, Daniel Magrish, Michael 101 F.3d 689 10/07/96
Purcell Bronson, Jesse Bond v. M. Ferson, Hearing Examiner, Tim Collins, Super, Asst.,lieutenant Furrer, Kim Anderson, Sci-pittsburgh Mail Roomemplyee, Robert James, Santo Andolina, Edwar Howe, Harrycallithen, David Good, James Thompson, Program Reviewcommittee Members, Robert Bitner, John Does, Central Office,review Committee Members, Superintendent White 101 F.3d 689 10/15/96
Cynthia Bradley v. Townhip of Upper Merion, Board of Supervisors of Township Ofupper Merion, David Erb Contractors, Inc., Mjtcontractors, Inc 101 F.3d 689 10/10/96
Philip Antoni v. E.j. Brennan, Warden, U.S. Parole Commission 101 F.3d 689 10/29/96
Gregory M. Chaklos, A/k/a Regional Director, Region Iiinational Association of Federal Injured Workers (nafiw) v. Robert Reich, U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department Oflabor, Ida Castro, Director of Office of Workerscompensation Programs 'owcp', Employment Standardsadministration, Hqs U.S. Department of Labor, Shelbyhallmark, Owcp Deputy Director, Thomas M. Markey, Directorof Federal Employees Compensation (fec) Division Owcp,dennis Mankin, Executive 101 F.3d 689 10/11/96
Merwyn Leonard Bryan v. East Stroudsburg University 101 F.3d 689 10/16/96
Tyrone S. Bey v. Thomas Ridge, Governor of Pa, Martin Horn, Pa Department Ofcorrections, Commissioner, Edward Brennan, Superintendent,shirley R. Moore, Asst. Warden, David L. Gearhart, Chiefclassification Officer, Frank Kauffman, Records Officer 101 F.3d 689 10/23/96
Keith Branch v. Kenneth D. Kyler, Sanders, Dentist; Keith Branch v. Kennethd. Kyler, Deputy Superintendent, Sanders 101 F.3d 689 10/28/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.manuel E. Mateo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the City of New York, the New York City Department Ofcorrections, the Commissioner of the New York Citydepartment of Corrections, John Doe # 1, M.d., a Doctor Atkings County Medical Center, John Doe # 2, a Correctionalofficer at Riker's Island Correctional Center Hospital, Thestate of New York, Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Commissioner Ofthe New York State Department of Correctional Services, Thegovernor of the State of New York, New York State Departmentof Correctional Services, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.uzoma Ukpabia, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.leonard F., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/13/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.claudious W. Channer, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Hartford, Defendant 101 F.3d 687 06/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.james Vigilante, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dominic Mantello, Superintendent, Wende Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Warnervision Entertainment, Inc. v. Empire of Carolina, Inc 101 F.3d 687 06/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23 101 F.3d 687 10/05/95
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.chukwumwa Okonkwo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 688 06/28/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.acli Government Securities, Inc., Plaintiff-petitioner-appellee, v. Daniel Rhoades and Milton Braten,defendants-counter-claimants-respondents-appellants,lewis Henkind and Holly Ventures, a Purported Partnership, Respondents,be Be Blond, Ltd., Respondent-appellant,ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Appellants 101 F.3d 688 06/28/96
William Baldwin v. Isac George, a Custodian, Librarian, Law Library Librarianfor Bayside State Prison, New Jersey Department Ofcorrections, Fred Siler, Jr., As Supervisor of Educationdepartment and Services, Law Library, Library Services Ofbayside State Prison, for New Jersey Department Ofcorrections, Warren D. Crawford, As Legal Coordinator,attorney for New Jersey Department of Corrections, Aslicensed New Jersey Attorneym New Jersey Department of 101 F.3d 689 10/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.maureen Alfano, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Department of Health and Human Services,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 688 06/28/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Jack Robinson; Anna Robinson; and Andre Pollak,defendants-appellants. Nos. 95-1688, 95-1692, 95-1695 101 F.3d 688 06/28/96
U.S. v. Diaz 101 F.3d 688 06/27/96
General Refractories Company, Grefco, Inc., Americanrefractories Company v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Great Lakescarbon; General Refractories Company, Grefco, Inc., Americarefractories Company, Chemrock Corporation v. Travelersinsurance Company, American Mutual Liability Insurancecompany, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. National Unionfire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa 101 F.3d 690 10/30/96
Ernst J. Gelin v. Michael P.w. Stone, Secretary of Army, Glen C. Peterson 101 F.3d 690 10/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Angelo Paccione, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Austin F. Moyer v. Stephanie M. Rudolph, A/k/a Stephanie M. Moyer, Norman L.goldberg, Esq., Joseph T. Labrum, Jr. J.c.p., Michael P.dignazio, Exq., Kenneth A. Clouse, J.c.p., Thomas Ridge,bofernor of Pennsylvania, State of Pennsylvania, John, Jane Doe(s) 101 F.3d 691 10/28/96
Rafael Oberti, by Parents Carlos Oberti, Jeanne Oberti v. Board of Education of Borough of Clementon School District,william Sherman, As Superintendent of School District Ofborough of Clementon, Steven K. Leibrand, James P. Dailey,sara A. Parazino, Roberth H. Moran, James D. Murray, Irenej. Buchalter, Harry F. Gahm, Earl F. Hettel, Ora Leewooster, Iii, William Norcross, As Members of Board Ofeducation of Borough of Clementon 101 F.3d 691 10/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.daniel Montalvo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Federal Express Corp., Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Caesar Graziano v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.s.department of Labor 101 F.3d 690 10/08/96
Bobby Earl Grant v. George Wilson, Lieutenant Phillips, Sgt. Rodney, Adamtruitt, Sgt. Mccart, Institutional Kitchen Workers 101 F.3d 690 10/21/96
Charles Mcguire v. James Forr, (grievance Coordinator) - Sci Frackville,suzanne Domalakes, (librarian) - Sci Frackville 101 F.3d 691 10/23/96
National Labor Relations Board v. Liquid Carriers Corporation 101 F.3d 691 10/16/96
Ronnie Lucas, a Minor by Parents Ronald Lucas, Lydia Annette Lucas v. City of Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, Police Department Fo Cityof Aliquippa 101 F.3d 691 10/16/96
Paul Price, Dennis Dowhy v. State of New Jersey, Deparment of Personnel, Lindaanselmini, Commissioner of Personnel, Anthony J. Cimino,retired Director of Personnel, Ms. Kerry Perretta, Directorof Department of Personnel-state of New Jersey, Robertmaurer, Retired Director of Deparment of Personnel, Stevegordon, John Kraus, Chris Levy, John Does, Jane Does, 1-100,, Who Had Responsibility to Perform Necessary, Sundry Dutiesto Create, Conduct, Conclude, Properly 101 F.3d 691 10/17/96
Rosalia Quasarano v. Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social Security 101 F.3d 691 10/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.rufus T. Mcpherson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/23/96
In Re Mercury America Corporation; Robert P. Gibbons,trustee for Mercury America Corporation v. Mercury International Ag, Alex Office Products & Systems,rene A. Schmid, Mercury America Corporation 101 F.3d 691 10/11/96
Joyde D. Little v. Clinton W. Smith, Lycoming County, Pennslyvania, Lycomingcounty Prison Board, David A. Desmond, Warden, Williamsporthospital, Family Practice Group, Dr. John Doe, Dr. John Doe# 2 (o'brian), Dr. John Doe #3, Prison Nurse Elaine, Prisonnurse Denise, Prison Nurse John Doe #4 101 F.3d 691 10/22/96
Zaid Kassim v. U.s 101 F.3d 690 10/23/96
Keith Felder v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Joseph D. Lehman,corrections Commissioner, David S. Owens, Jr., Robert M.freeman, Former Superintendent at Camp Hill, Captain Keith,correctional Officer at Aci, Officer Mac, Correctionalofficer, Steven Black, Kevin Mcconaughey 101 F.3d 690 10/09/96
Robert D. Johnson v. Hiler, Berthlotte, Stewart, Warman, Sacks 101 F.3d 690 10/28/96
John Richard Jae v. Rebecca Kessler, As Former Director/coordinator, Robertkaminsky, Director/coordinator, Special Needsunit, State Correctional Institution Atpittsburgh, 101 F.3d 690 10/09/96
Richard E. Farley v. Cessna Aircraft Company 101 F.3d 690 10/25/96
Richard Dennis, Penelope Dennis, Loretta M. Dennis v. City of Easton, Edward J. Ferraro, Robet S. Stein, Dorisasteak, Paul Schleuter, Howard B. White, Eastonboard of Health 101 F.3d 690 10/10/96
United States Court of Appeals,third Circuit 101 F.3d 690 10/10/96
Giacomo Dinorscio, Gerald Cohen v. U.s., Gerald Cohen; Giacomo Dinorscio, Gerald Cohen v. U.s.,giacomo Dinorscio 101 F.3d 690 10/22/96
Theodore James Kukich v. County of Westmoreland, Thomas J. Sculco 101 F.3d 690 10/08/96
Jeffrey E. Johnson, Curtis Sawyer, Jonathan P. Jones, Bryank. Wade, All Other Prisoners Similarly Situated Atwestmoreland County Prison v. Richard F. Vidmer, Terry R. Marlot, Tom Balya, Countycommissioners, Kurt T. Scalzott, Warden, Williamwhirlow, Deputy Warden of Security,allegheny Telephone Company,jeffrey E. Johnson 101 F.3d 690 10/28/96
In Re Lease-a-fleet, Inc., Debtor; Lease-a-fleet, Inc.,rawle & Henderson, Needle & Feldman, First Union Nationalbank of Florida, Carro, Spanbock, Castor & Cuiffo, Cohen,engel & Albert, Holtzman, Krinzman & Equels, Nihill & Riedley, P.c 101 F.3d 690 10/21/96
Jeffrey David Hill v. Pa Department of Environmental Resources, Richard L. Maxwell 101 F.3d 690 10/07/96
Paul Desabetino v. Edward T. Brennan, Superintendent, Judith A. Weyers, Doctorparker, Doctor Baker, Doctor Roman, Doctor Terry 101 F.3d 690 10/09/96
Thomas L. Glover v. William H. Fauver, Commissioner, Department of Correction,patrick Mcmanimon, Warden, Officer Bone 101 F.3d 690 10/28/96
District Council 33, American Federation of State, County,municipal Employees, District Council 47, Americanfederation of State, County, Municipal Employees, Afl-cio,william Ennis, George Guagenti, Joseph Mctamney, Francisbujak, Richard Grochowski v. City of Philadelphia 101 F.3d 690 10/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23 101 F.3d 687 02/08/95
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.u.s. v. Barwick 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Somyos Kedjumnong, Aka "odd"; Wilawan Prajimnok, Aka "lek";siew Geok Adkins, Aka "lilly Chan"; Somchay Khounsavanh,aka "sam"; Wanida Kitjaorapin, Aka "linda"; Chawalitsilapanon; Yuk Lam Chan; Joseph Morales, Defendants,saravut Wattanasiri, Aka "yai," Aka "kevin"; Thongchaiwutthidetgrainggrai, Aka "kiang," Aka "kriang";kiok Kwon, Aka "jade," Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.in Re 183 Lorraine Street Associates, Debtor.united Capital Corp., Fka Metropolitan Consolidatedindustries, Inc., Ak Attilio F. Petrocelli,plaintiff-appellee, v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates, Irving Goldstein, Joseph K.nathanson, City of New York, and the People of Thestate of New York, Defendants-appellees,french Bourekas Inc., Defendant-appellant,joseph Fischer, Creditor-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.donald H. Brown, John Markowicz, Paul Pushlar, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Francis Costello, Town of Fenner, Michael Larkin, Lynnkeator, and David Shephard, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 685 05/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Paula Buckley, Addie Fields, Defendants-appellants,rae Ursillo, Defendant 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.victor Perez, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Frank Delorenzo, Manager, Michael Nurik, Supervisor, Glenicereavis, Principal Clerk of Office 521, Johnhudacs, Commissioner, and New York Statedepartment of Labor,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 686 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.eric Spiegelman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Reprise Records, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., Mtv Networks,and Bmi, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 685 05/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.lenore Dean, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Abrams, Former New York State Attorney General,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States, Appellee, v. Jamil Hamdan (aka "jimmy") and Omar Adel Mohamed,defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 686 06/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ivan P., As Parent & Next Friend of Lukas P., a Minor Child,plaintiff-appellee, v. Board of Education, a Local Education Agency, Defendant-appellant,board of Education, a Connecticut Public Education Agencyand Department of Education, a Connecticut Publiceducation Agency, Defendants 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.mason Tenders Local Union 59; Mason Tenders Local Union 23and Joseph Giardina; Mason Tenders Local Union 46and Joseph Luciano, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Laborers' International Union of North America and Stevehammond, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 686 06/04/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Melvin Applebaum, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Richard Pagliarulo, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.carlton Whitney, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Postal Service. Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.in Re Braniff International Airlines, Inc., Debtor.crossland Federal Savings Bank, As Assignee of the Claims Ofcpf Premium Funding, Inc., Appellant, v. Braniff International Airlines, Inc., Debtor-appellee 101 F.3d 686 06/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.sharon Chavis, Plaintiff-appellant, v. A-1 Limousine; Home State Insurance; Agency Rent-a-car,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 686 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.meren Ptah, Petitioner-appellant, v. Sally B. Johnson, Superintendent, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Isidro Aviles, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 686 06/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.robert Carpenter, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 686 06/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.gary Morsony; Candy Morsony, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Tech Weld Ltd, Defendant,mack Trucks, Inc, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 686 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ferrari North America, Inc., Petitioner-appellee, v. Crown Auto Dealerships, Doing Business As Crown Jaguar,inc., Respondent-appellant 101 F.3d 686 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.felix Nwaebo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 686 05/31/96
Platsky v. Kilpatrick 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.peter A. Ryan, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York City Department of Corrections, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 686 06/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Esteban Lozano-reyes, Aka Steve Lozano, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 686 06/12/96
U.S. v. Charleswell-batista 101 F.3d 686 06/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john Schultz, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.,defendant-third-party-plaintiff-appellee, v. K-b Transport, Inc., Third-party Defendant 101 F.3d 686 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.bart Schwartz, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Department of Justice, Margaret M. Lacovara,u.s. Probation Officer, and United Statesdepartment of Probation Officer, Andunited States Department Ofprobation,defendant-appellees 101 F.3d 686 06/06/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.norbert Rivera, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 686 05/31/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Vincent Zappola, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 686 06/04/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Leo Eshekha Momoh, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 686 05/31/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23 101 F.3d 686 02/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.edwin Nachbaur, Plaintiff-appellant, v. St. Luke's-roosevelt Hospital Center, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.howard Ayers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sergeant Paul Stewart and Captain David Stark, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.u.s. v. Paccione 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Steven Long, Steven Crea, Dominick Truscello, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.angelo Favarolo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/13/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.michael J. Oliva, Michael J. Oliva, Both Individually & Onbehalf of All Similarly Situated Rural Carrierrelief Employees, v. Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service Andthe National Rural Letter Carrier's Association,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.michael Fundator, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Columbia University of New York, Robert E. Bunselmeyer, Androbert E. Furno, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.vincent J. Catalfo, Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.eugenio Lanfranco, Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.o. Surbra, C.o. Polino; Joseph Wood; Captain John Doe,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jose Rivera, Petitioner-appellant, v. Robert Kuhlmann, Superintendent of Sullivan Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23 101 F.3d 681 04/30/75
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Nassau County, Defendant-appellee,daniel D. Jackson, Paul R. Degen, Kathleen G. Vanwallendael,appellants 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.neil Mcnaughton, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Rudolph Giuliani, As Mayor of the City of New York, Brianjoseph, As Commissioner of Finance, Randy Levine, Ascommissioner of Labor Relations, Simon Salas, Devora Cohn,patricia Mcm. Bartels, Muriel Goode-trufant, Todd Bromberg,the City of New York, the New York City Department Offinance, and the New York City Office of Labor Relations,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. David Batashvili; David Bachakashvili; Jonathan Sadov;shura Milman and Svetlana Shkolnik, Defendants,yakov Bachakashvili; Joseph Chicareli; and Jorgepemberton, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 687 06/26/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jose Harris, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii; Daniel A. Senkowski, Stanley Berg,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. George Santiago A/k/a Tito, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.joseph P. Sullivan, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Manfred Ohrenstein, Individually and As Minority Leader Ofthe New York State Senate, Robert J. Bergin, Individuallyand As Counsel to New York State Senate Minority Leader Andthomas Cetrino, Individually and As Director of the Minorityprogram Office of the New York State Senate, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 685 05/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.orville Lloyd Hunter, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 686 06/06/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. John W. Harrison, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 686 05/31/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.phyllis M. Lloyd, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, in Her Official Capacity As Commissionerof Social Security, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 686 05/06/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.joseph Allen Ross, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Lee Jewett, Pilar Mcdermott, Vincent Nigro Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 686 06/07/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.james E. Williams, Ii, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Cynthia Rice Nathan, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/13/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ray Ross, Petitioner-appellant, v. Henry Gavin, Supt. of Mid Orange Correctional Facility,respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.karl W. Jelenic, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Plastics and Iue Local 318, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/18/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jimmie Garner and Connie Garner, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Energy Transportation Corporation, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.wayne Smith, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York State Department of Labor, Local Union 28apprentice Committee, Mr. N. Forman, Senior Unemploymentinsurance Hearing Representative, "mr. Hadius," As New Yorkstate Commissioner of Labor, Mr. German, As Supervisinglabor Service Representative, "mr. Delenzo," As Manager Ofcommunity Service Center 521, Mr. Garvey, As New York Cityregional Director, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.francis Wang, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the New York City Police Department, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.pedro Da Silva, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 687 06/25/96
Pnc Bank National Association, Formerly Pittsburgh National Bank v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 101 F.3d 691 10/22/96
Wilfred Hart, Jr. v. Margaret Harding, Warden Lsci Allenwood, Wilfred Hart, Ii 101 F.3d 690 10/09/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.roy Commer, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the City of New York, District Council 37, and Local 375,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.alonzo Spencer Owens, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Presbyterian Hospital in the City of New York, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.johnathan Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Captain Biran Kenny, Shield # 363, and Department Ofcorrection, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.carolyn L. O'neal, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the Carborundum Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.melvin P. Deutsch, Petitioner-appellant, v. Calvin Morton, Warden, M.d.c. Brooklyn, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Ralph Giordano; Alphonse v. Sisca; Robert Baviello;vincent J. Laforte; Joe Olivera; Edward J. Kavanaugh;ralph Agovino; Anthony Capuano; Anthony Damiani; Victorsignorini; Angelo Piacentino; Renato Lindia; Stevepicone; Jose Cesareo Gonzalez, Jr.; Anders Gueche; Stevealfisi, Also Known As "dee Dee"; Alberto Yepez, Also Knownas "albert"; and Eugene Dinapoli, Defnedants,victor Roussos; Genaro Perpinan; Frank Mandarino; Evelynhorta, Also Known As "pee Wee"; and Charlesguida, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 682 04/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.henry Casivant, Plaintiff-appellant, v. County of Columbia; Mitchell Oxehnhorn, As Commissioner Ofthe Columbia County Department of Social Services; Nanhermus, Individually and As Director of Social Services Ofthe Columbia County Department of Social Services; Rolandbarth, Individually and As Employee of the Columbia Countydepartment of Social Services; John Hallenbeck; John Doe,mary Roe, and Mary Doe, Who Are Employees, Not As Yetidentified, of the Columbia County Department of Socialservices; Pamela Joern, Individually and As Assistantcounty Attorney and Attorney for the Columbia Countydepartment of Social Services, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/10/96
Plaintiff v. Defendant 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.bandele J. Talib, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Transport Workers Union of America, Afl-cio, Local 100,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.steve Rivera, Petitioner-appellant, v. John P. Keane, Superintendent, and Sing Sing Correctionalfacility, Respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/16/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.steven Lappe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Honda Motor Company Ltd. of Japan, Honda Research &development, Ltd., American Honda Motor Co. Inc., Abc Co.and Johns Doe, Names of Fictitious Manufacturers, Designersand/or Distributors, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jack D. Liffiton, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Glen Reukauf, Joseph Coyne, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.lionel Marquez, Jr., Rosario Marquez, A/k/a Eliza Rosario,and Lionel Marquez, Sr., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.cedric Young, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Robert Kuhlman, Superintendent,sullivan Corr., Lilliam Stettner, Head Hospitaladministrator, Sharon J. Lilley, Nurse Administrator, Guytufua, Sabrina Von Hagn, C.o.b. Mccormick, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/16/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.eric N. Kemer, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Roger Johnson, Administrator, General Servicesadministration, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.vincent J. Catalfo, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. William Chapman, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jefferson Mclamb, Petitioner-appellant, v. John Keane, Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 683 05/13/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Dandeny Munoz-mosquera, Also Known As Dandenismunoz-mosquera, Also Known As Dandenes Munoz-mosquera, Alsoknown As Luis Fernandez, Also Known As Hernandez-hernandez,also Known As Esteban Restrepo Echavarria, Also Known As Laquinca, Also Known As Luis Fernando, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 683 05/09/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.karl Ragland, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Commissioner Abate, Commissioner of the City of New Yorkdepartment of Corrections, Warden Haughton, Warden of Thequeens House of Detention for Men New York Department Ofcorrection, Correction Officer Peace, Correction Officer Atthe Queens House of Detention for Men, New York Citydepartment of Correction, Correction Officer Dowtin,correction Officer at the Queens House of Detention for Men,new York City Department of Correction, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 683 05/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.melvin P. Deutsch, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.milagros Quintana, A/k/a Milagros Echavvaria, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Medical Research Associates, P.c., Robert Nathan Belkin,m.d., P.c., Mary S. Martin, and Westchester Countymedical Center, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.christian W. Lejarde, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.wayne C. Bryan, Petitioner-appellant, v. Charles Cobb, District Director, Immigration Andnaturalization Service, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.salvatore Bacchi, Petitioner-appellant, v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States v. Jairo Lopez and Jairo Emil Zuluaga, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 683 05/09/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.stanley Moore, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Donald Selsky, Christopher Artuz, R. Sanford, Lieutenant,mr. Shannon, Sergeant, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Carlos A. Osorio and Angel A. Balbas, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 683 05/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.melvin P. Deutsch, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Courtena A. Druker, U.s.department of Justice, F.b.i., Frank H.easterbrook, Mark S. Cohen, Alanbergman, Westlaw Publishingcompany, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Duane Miller v. Asbury Heights Nursing Home 101 F.3d 691 10/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.abdel-jabbor Malik, Plaintiff-appellant, v. G.i. Hirshberger, Warden, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Joseph Contini, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.mustapha Olateju, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/03/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Arthur Preston and Tony Jerome Barr, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.anthony James Peterkin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. T. Urling Walker, City of Watertown Mayor, Michael J.hennegan, City of Watertown Police Chief, Policeofficer Woods, City of Watertown, Defendants, 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Ronald Koron, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.james H. Gary, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Pension Fund of International Union of Operating Engineers,# 478, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Wendy Hardison, Defendant,wayne Hardison, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.sadie Matthews, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social Security. Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.pyramid Management Group, Inc., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent.national Labor Relations Board, Cross-petitioner, v. Pyramid Management Group, Inc., Cross-respondent 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Daniel O. Teyibo, A/k/a Daniel O. Teyido, A/k/a Richard K.gant, A/k/a Samuel O. Ajao, A/k/a Jack Renfro,defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.milica Vuksanaj, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Building Services 32b-j Health & Pension Fund and Jamestoomey, Fund Manager, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.cesar L. Vasquez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New Britain General Hospital, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Victor Castro, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Gustavo Moncada, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 681 04/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ronald Whitaker, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Roy Vadala; Joseph Vadala, Defendants,mark Vadala, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/19/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.michael A. Livecche, Jr. and David Francis, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. County of Cattaraugus; Donald E. Furman, Countyadministrator; Cattaraugus County Sheriff's Department;jerry Burrell; Joseph Keller, Treasurer; Bernard C.miller, Real Property Tax Service Director; Dustman, Undersheriff; Buckhardt, Deputy Sheriff; Thomas Howard, Deputysheriff; Does # 1-5; Matson Auction and Real Estate Co.,auctioneer; John/jane Doe # 6, Referee; William Gross;don Winship; Richard A. Gowan, Jr.; D. John Zimbardi;howard D. Zollinger; Gary M. Felton; Gerard J.fitzpatrick; Richard E. Haberer; Larry G. Mack; Williama. Reynolds; N.j. Augostin, Jr.; Richard E. Vossler;benjamin J. Calabro; Kenneth W. Mcclune; Joseph K. Eade;marian E. Kramer; Mary E. Berstein; Charlotte M.mclaughlin; Donald F. Mcclean; Hobart Hall; John T.walgus; Sandra W. Wyllie, County Legislators, Being Sued Intheir Official And/or Private Capacities, Individually,jointly, and Severally, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/12/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john A. Mcwilliams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York City Board of Education, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Jeanette Cuevas, Defendant,carl Mariette, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.la Reunion Francaise, Petitioner-appellant, v. Christopher J. Martin, As Subscribing Underwriter on Behalfof Himself and on Behalf of All Other Participatingunderwriters at Lloyd's of London; C. Roy Hill; M.f.baird; A.p. Bartlett; G.c. Welch; P.d. Morey; S.f.fletcher; M.j. White; P.d. Maughan; B.j. Adams; M.w.blair; A.d. Pilcher; S.r. Bishop; S.i. Cowley; I.c.agnew; S.h. Barder; D. Wills; P.h. Jenks; K.r. Potter;c.w. Rome; T.j. Kemp; E. Pieri; G.c.f. Palmer; S.j.o.catlin, Pursuant to Their Proportionate Subscribing Shares,respondents-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Victor Edward Kiendra, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Michael H. Aldi, Defendant-appellant,joseph A. Franco, Defendant 101 F.3d 682 04/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Young Taek Lee, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.the Guardian Life Insurance of America,plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellee, v. Joan B. Roma, Defendant-counter-claimant-appellant,felix Roma, Sons, Inc., Defendant-appellant,anthony F. Roma, Defendant 101 F.3d 682 04/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.harry N. Carter, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 682 04/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Carlos Tipantuna Chuquimarca, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Patrick Brown, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 682 04/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.marcus Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Janina Strife, Senior Librarian, Oneida Correctionalfacility; P. Naughton, Lieutenant; P. Mooney,lieutenant; E. Reynold, Superintendent;w. Komenecky, Captain,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/19/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.johnathan Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Officer Sokol; Officer Pryor; Officer Nieves; Officerreteguiz, Corrections Officers, Queens House Ofdetention, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 682 04/19/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Giuseppe Gambino, Francesco Gambino, Lorenzo Mannino,salvatore Lobuglio, Salvatore Rina, Guiseppe D'amico,salvatore D'amico, Francesco Cipriano, Pietro Candela,salvatore Candela, Francesco Inzerillo, Joseph Larosa, Paolod'amico, Roco Launi, Fabrizio Tesi, Vittorio Barletta,carmelo Guarnera, Sasha (lnu), Giovanni Zarbano, Rosarionaimo, Emanuele Adamita, Giovanni Gambino, Defendants,matteo Romano, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 683 05/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.herschel Brown, Plaintiff-appellant, v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.phyllis Becker; Andrew Becker, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Club Las Velas, a Mexican Corporation, and Its Sales Andmarketing Representative, the Hotel Company, a New Yorkcorporation; Fling Vacations Inc., a Pennsylvaniacorporation; John Does 1-3, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.major Oldsmobile, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 684 05/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Robert Brook, Walter Hines; Rafael Scifo, Aka Ralph;richard Notarmuzi, Aka Ricky; John Serpentilli; Georgemilo; Raymond Otley; Anthony O'donnell, Aka Tony;salvatore Guastella, Aka Sal; Glenn Schaeffer, Defendants,edward Fahey, Aka Eddie, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.donald R. Jermosen, Appellant, v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii; Daniel Senkowski; Robert Bolak;dennis A. Mcguire; W. Wilkerson; David Rock, Lieutenant;k. Koktowski; W. Costello; G. Wright; Robert Clukey; J.carey; Bruce Bourgeois; J. Keysor, Employee of Clintoncorrectional Facility, John Duquette, Employee of Clintoncorrectional Facility; Donald Selsky, Director of Specialhousing Unit Programs, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/16/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Eric Adams, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. George Rivera, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/24/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Vincent J. Militano, Milton Sonneberg, John J. Cranley, Jr.,thomas Core, John Kolb, Carl Varrone, Defendants,robert Sayegh, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.bart Schwartz, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Department of Justice, United States Attorney, Davidmeister, Nordstrom, Inc., Allen G. Reiter,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.eugene Polin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles Hannigan; Peter Broderick; Claude Jeorg; Roger L.banan; Angelo Delsigore; Matthew Murphy; Joseph Frazier;edward Perlman; Richard Speranza; William Lewis; Rogershoemaker; Niagara County, As a Person; Mark Violante;deborah Trattel; John Mattio; Patrick Petrie; Johnroberts; Law Firm of Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll,schuller, James, Also Known As Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer,roll, Schuller and James; Paul Cambria; Mary Good; Josephlatona; David Schopp; Susan Wheatley; Salvatoresanfilippo; Boomer; Pine; Balio; Lawton; Davis; Boehm;joan Varney, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Carey D. Jackson and Rodney A. Jackson, Defendants-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Reuven Finkelstein and Simon Greenbaum, A/k/a Simon Green,defendants-appellants,pinchus Horowitz; Levi Horowitz; Steven Stone; Barbarawexler, Abraham Brin; Michael Klein; Simon Green; Kcgcomputing, Inc.; G. Contracting, Inc.; Kent Mills, Inc.;east Imports, Inc.; Avrechai Gur; Medin Realty Corp.;bredis Food Handlers; Zeigel Manor Realty Sales; Andmardon Manufacturing and Hospital Software, Defendants 101 F.3d 684 05/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.carol Ruth, Inc.; Pandora Industries, Inc.,plaintiffs-counter-defendants-appellants, v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company,defendants-counter-claimants-appellees 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.andrew Styles, Petitioner-appellant, v. Richard J. Van Zandt, Superintendent of the Washingtoncorrectional Facility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 684 05/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Gilberto Carpio-bajana, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellant-cross-appellee, v. Mario Chalarca, Defendant-appellee-cross-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.the Belmonts, a Partnership Consisting of Warren Gradus Andfred Milano,plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant-cross-appellee, v. Dion Dimucci, Defendant-counter-claimant-appellee-cross-appellant,carlo Mastrangelo; Angelo D'aleo, Dick Fox, Madison Squaregarden Corporation, Defendants-counter-claimants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. George A. Petkash; Edward Kenefick; Linus Beaulieu, Defendants,thomas Petkash, Perry Petkash, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john J. Mccarthy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Lawrence Meachum, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.david J. Lindsay, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jaime Pineda, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/24/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.robert Bowen, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. $6,480.00 in United States Currency, Defendant,mary Workman, Claimant-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.gilbert Yearwood, Petitioner-appellant, v. John P. Keane, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. John Pelletiere, Also Known As "jay"; Defendant,sheri Cohen, Also Known As Samantha Cohen, and Also Known Assherri Cohen, and Gary Stevens, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Dwight Mason v. Patrick Arvonio, Warden, Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney Generalof State of New Jersey, Mary Keating Disabato,chairman New Jersey State Parole Board 101 F.3d 691 10/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.manhattan King David Restaurant, Inc., Le Sannom Buildingcorp.; 255 West 4th St. Realty Corp.; 47-49charles Street, Inc.; 209 Holdingcorp.; Joseph Fischer,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Hon. Cornelius Blackshear, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.u.s. Underwriters Insurance Company, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gongregation B'nai Israel, Defendant-appellant,wessa Eskandar, Defendant 101 F.3d 685 05/24/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.taber Partners I, D/b/a Ambassador Plaza Hotel & Casino, Aradisson Plaza Hotel, Petitioner/cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.whitney Lombas, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Moran Towing & Transportation Company, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Kingsley Macebuh, Also Known As Christopher Urz, Also Knownas Christopher Urzs, Also Known As Urzs Kingsley, Also Knownas Arthur King, Also Known As S. Ruz, Also Known As Nelsonbello, Also Known As Kenneth Brisdale, Also Known As M.harold, Also Known As Christopher Mathews, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/24/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.in Re Georgiana H. Jungels, Debtor.georgiana H. Jungels, Appellant, v. State of New York, Appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.michael D. O'neill, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the City of Auburn, Guy Cosentino, Mayor of the City Ofauburn, James E. Malone, City Manager for the City Ofauburn, James Hutchinson, Councilor of the City of Auburn,ann Bunker, Councilor of the City of Auburn, Andrew V.lalonde, As Corporation Counsel for the City of Auburn,other Unknown, Other Unknown and Unnamed Participants in Thecomplained Acts, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 685 05/24/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.abiodun Giwah, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Joseph Rainier, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 685 05/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Raul Valdez, Aka Flaco, Defendant,charles Jefferson, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/20/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.wilfredo Polanco, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Lt. K. Pierce, Donald Selsky, and Comm. Thomas A. Coughlin,iii, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23 101 F.3d 684 08/11/95
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john Lambert, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 684 05/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.inner City Press/community on the Move, and Its Members Andaffiliates; South Bronz/inner City Prospective Homeownersassociation; Inner City Community Development Loan Fund,the South Bronx/inner City Small Business Alliance; Matthewlee and Vielka Peguero, Petitioners, v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Respondent,chemical Banking Corporation, the Chase Manhattancorporation, Chemical Bank, and the Chasemanhattan Bank, N.a., Intervenors 101 F.3d 684 05/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.robert Sunenblick, D/b/a Uptown Records, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Andre Harrell; Mca Inc.; Andre Harrell, Inc.; Mcarecords, Inc., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.david and Donna L. Huggins, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 684 05/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Peter M. Resnik, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.talakkottur R. David, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Apfel Levy Zlotnick & Co., Anton A. Weiss and John Buchheit,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/16/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.reginald Trammell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. J. Lanfear, Hearing Officer, Great Meadow Correctionalfacility, S. Roberts, Hearing Officer, Great Meadowcorrectional Facility, J. Stinson, Superintendent, T.coughlin, Commissioner, and Susan Murphy, Assistantcommissioner, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.peter Mobijohn, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ellenville Central School District, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Craig Williams, Darryl Board, Anderson King, Aka Hasanabdul-malik, and Idris Cox, Defendants-appellants,najimah Abdul and Jerome Tolden, Aka Wadoud, Defendants 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.june Faulkner Crossman, Sophie B. Chmil, Dorothy Mcgough,ida K. Galante, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Matthew T. Crosson, Irving C. Sperber, Harold Butler,charles Koster, Lois Mitchell, Peter Lioio, Robertpalmer, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Rossie Anderson, A/k/a John Davis, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/16/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Alejandro Martinez, Also Known As Alejandro Martinez-garcia;jose De Jesus Zapata-herrera, Also Known As El Chino, Alsoknown As Jose Mario Perez; Johnny Aybar; Jose Miguelrodriguez; Michael R. Williams; Margarita Hernandez;francisco Bolivar and Holguer Miguel Garay, Also Known Asluis Alica Reina, Defendants,nelson Aybar and Felix Hernandez, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 684 05/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.james Edward Moore, Petitioner-appellant, v. Robert E. Kuhlmann, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Hok Kwai Chau, A/k/a "peter Chan," Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 684 05/20/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.rick Blake, Petitioner-appellant, v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 684 05/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.raymond Jemzura, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York State Electric & Gas Corporation; Public Servicecommission; Eugene Connell, Acting Chief, Consumerassistance, State of New York Department of Public Service;john D. Draghi, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/17/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.dean Witter Reynolds Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Continental Casualty Company; National Fire Insurancecompany of Hartford, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Paul Anthony Walters & Patrick Walters, Also Known Asinfinite, Isaac Lanier, Also Known As El-bar,defendants-appellants.samar Dphrepaulezz, Gina Walters, Maurice King, Also Knownas Balik, Karen Blackmon, Shawn Hood, Also Known As Freedomfree, Jose Martinez, Cassandra Bonner, Deborah Waldemar,larry Scales, Also Known As Sincere, William Eaddy, Alsoknown As Messiah, Avis Walters & Genevieve Walters, Defendants 101 F.3d 684 05/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.leroy Moore, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Albany, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 683 05/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Yitzchok Twersky, A/k/a "jeff," and Emil Friedman, Defendants,aaron Groszman, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 683 04/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.in Re: Tamara Eugenia Pal, Debtor,tamara Eugenia Pal, Appellant, v. Weatherguard Industries, Inc., Creditor-appellee,hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Wood & Goodyear, A. Hershel Smith, Esq., 101 F.3d 684 05/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.karl Ahlers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John P. Keane, Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctionalfacility; Charles Griener, Deputy Superintendent of Singsing Correctional Facility; R. Healy, Lieutenant;patterson, Lieutenant; and S. Amoia, Sergeant, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 684 05/22/96
Bobby James Moore, Petitioner-appellee, v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminaljustice, Institutional Division, Respondent-appellant 101 F.3d 1069 12/06/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ralph Cole, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1076 12/09/96
Michael Mcgehee, Gayln Mcgehee, Plaintiffs, v. Certainteed Corporation, Defendant-appellee.vetrotex Certainteed Corp., Defendant/third-party Plaintiff-appellee, v. Lloyd Swaim, D/b/a Insulation Specialities, Third-partydefendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1078 12/10/96
In the Matter of Elwood Cluck, Debtor.elwood Cluck; Kristine A. Cluck; First Capital Mortgagecompany, Incorporated, Appellants, v. Randolph N. Osherow, Trustee; Thomas William Mckenzie, Appellees 101 F.3d 1081 12/19/96
Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,042sarah M. Jackson and Leo Smith, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy K. O'shields, J & T Enterprises, Inc., John T.hanna, and Larry Wallen, Defendants.canal Insurance Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Sarah M. Jackson, Leo Smith, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 1083 12/19/96
John R. Turco, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Defendants,hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1090 02/13/97
Texas Manufactured Housing Association, Inc.; A.j. Waller,sr., Plaintiffs-appellants v. Nederland, City Of; Zoning Board of Appeals, City Ofnederland, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1095 12/26/96
In Re: James A. Brady, Debtor.james A. Brady, Defendant-appellant, v. Donald T. Mcallister, Plaintiff-appellee 101 F.3d 1165 02/21/97
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. William R. Hall, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1174 12/02/96
Indiana State Teachers Association, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis,defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1179 12/02/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul L. Glover, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1183 12/02/96
Veronica R. Matos, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Richard A. Nellis, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1193 12/03/96
Carolyn G. Winkler, Individually and As the Independentexecutrix of the Estate of Bernie A. Winkler, Etal., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Eli Lilly & Co. and Paul Smith, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1196 12/03/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kenneth Wendell Jones, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jeffrey Lane Barnes, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1263 12/31/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jimmy Brown, Also Known As Marlus Andrew Singleton,defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1272 12/04/96
Prod.liab.rep. (cch) P 14,802george Fought; Glenda Fought, Appellants, v. Hayes Wheels International, Inc.; Kumho U.s.a., Inc.; Defendants,general Motors Corporation, Appellees,kumho & Company, Inc., Defendants 101 F.3d 1275 12/05/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Ivory Mosby, Also Known As Rafiq Zareef Muhaymin, Appellant 101 F.3d 1278 12/06/96
United States of America, Appellee, v. Weldon B. Nelson; Grace M. Nelson, Appellants 101 F.3d 1284 12/06/96
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8373, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 13,963state of Alaska Ex Rel. Yukon Flats School District,unalakleet/neeser Construction Jv, Unalakleetnative Corporation, Neeser Constructioncompany, and Gerald Neeser,plaintiffs-appellees, v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, A/k/a Thenative Village of Venetie, the Venetie Tax Court, Thevenetie Tax Commission, Gideon James, Lawrence Roberts,larry Williams, Ernest Erick, Lincoln Tritt, John Titus, Anddavid Case, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 1286 11/20/96
Chemical Weapons Working Group (cwwg); Sierra Club Andvietnam Veterans of America Foundation,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Department of the Army, United States Department of Defenseand Eg & G Defense Material, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1360 12/06/96
Walter Mcmillian, Plaintiff-appellee, v. W.e. Johnson, Tommy Herring, Tom Allen, in Their Individualcapacities, et al., Defendants,thomas Tate, Simon Benson, Larry Ikner, in Their Individualcapacities, Defendants-appellants,association of County Commissioners of Alabama Liabilityself Insurance Fund, Intervenor-defendant 101 F.3d 1363 12/03/96
In Re John Mills, Jr., Petitioner 101 F.3d 1369 12/05/96
Christopher Todd Mayfield, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Patterson Pump Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1371 12/20/96
John Rooney, Iii, John Rooney, Jr., Marsha Rooney, Keithrooney, by and Through His Next Best Friend, Johnrooney, Jr., His Father, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. George Lee Watson, Individually and in His Officialcapacity, County of Volusia, Defendants-appellees,department of Public Safety, Volusia Co., Defendant 101 F.3d 1378 12/26/96
Freddie Glenn Pope, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Roy Hightower, Associate Commissioner, Alabama Dept. Ofcorrections, Defendant-appellant,ronald W. Kitzinger, Deputy Warden, Ken Mayes, Institutionalaccounting Officer, Mci Telecommunications Corporation,ronald E. Jones, W.i. Petry Company, Inc., State of Alabama,alabama Department of Corrections, Defendants 101 F.3d 1382 12/26/96
In Re the Regents of the University of California, Petitioner 101 F.3d 1386 11/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.larry Shuster, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Eliot Gersten; John Geiger; Ed Nayle; Cathy Nagey;customs Service; Drug Enforcement Administration; 50unnamed Dea Agent; Gerald Whitmore; Martin Mcguire;special Agent Anderson; N.y.s. Trooper Rubio; Richardgittleman, Fbi; Special Agent Sullivan; Mel Minsry; Amyschwarts; Ritorto, Attorney; John Luksic; Harry Brownesq; First Aviation; Johnson Contrad; Port Authority Ofnew York and New Jersey, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1392 07/03/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Jin Tang Huang, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1392 07/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. All Right, Title and Interest in a 30 Acre Parcel of Land,more or Less, and Appurtenances Thereto, Known As Breezyhill Road, City of Parksville, Town of Liberty, Sullivancounty, New York, Defendant,joel M. Proyect, Claimant-appellant 101 F.3d 1392 07/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.vanessa Stewart, Individually and As Parent and Naturalguardian of Terry Mark Rich and Alicia D. Smith,plaintiffs-appellants, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Brian Thomas; Leslye Huiswoud, Defendants-appellants,steven Engler, Defendant 101 F.3d 1392 07/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.in Re French Bourekas Inc., Debtor.french Bourekas Inc., Peter Cohen, Equity Security Holder,steven Cohen, Equity Security Holder, and Josephcohen, Equity Security Holder,plaintiffs-appellants,joseph Fischer, Creditor-appellant, v. United Capital Corp. and William Turner, As Receiver,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1392 07/05/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.w. Alton Jones Foundation; Wenonah Development Company;foster and Foster; Foster Ban; Alma Fosterdavis; Cities Service Company; Harryc. Bader and Ann D. Friel,plaintiffs-appellees, v. Chevron U.s.a., Inc., F/k/a Gulf Oil Corporation, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1392 07/10/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.donald Mccray, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii; Carl S. Smith; Doctor Mark F.zongrone, Md; Sergeant Hawes, Security Officer; James A.mance, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Marcy Correctionalfacility, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1392 07/03/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john Valenti, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Laura E. Murray, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1392 07/03/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.carlos Samper, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Catherine M. Abate, Commissioner Department of Correctionalservice for the City of New York; Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii,commissioner Department of Correctional Services for Thestate of New York; Robert B. Greifinger, Dr., Chiefdirector, Health Service; A. Arevalo, Dr., Facility Healthdirector; W. Wilkinson, Medical Examiner; John Doe, Healthservices Director-north Infirmary Command; John Doe, Healthservices Director, Brooklyn Correctional Facility; Johndoe, Health Services Director Manhattan Detention Complex,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1392 07/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.gary Dunn, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Social Security Administrationcommissioner, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.angela L. Groff, Plaintiff-cross-appellant,michele L. Meyers, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David J. Kyzmir, Clerk of the Niagara County Legislature,defendant-appellant-cross-appellee,county of Niagara, New York, Defendant-cross-appellee,richard Shanley, William L. Ross, Chairman of the Niagaracounty Legislature, John Doe, and Richard Roe, Defendants 101 F.3d 1392 07/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.mark A. Jenkins and Marion F. Jenkins, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Michael Catalano, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1392 07/11/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.steven Smith, Petitioner-appellant, v. John P. Keane, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Latonya Nicole Cox, Defendant,dale Orville Wathey, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1392 07/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.robert Moates, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Hans Walker, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility;thomas A. Coughlin, Commissioner, New York Statedepartment of Correctional Services,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1392 07/02/96
Notice: This is an Unpublished Opinion. Use Fi Cta2 § 0.23 for Rules Regarding the Publication and Citation of Unpublished Opinions.simone S. Dewey, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Pit Telecom Netherlands, U.s., Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.santos Gonzalez, Petitioner-appellant, v. Robert Kuhlman, Superintendent of the Sullivan Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.mark Hughes, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii; Daniel A. Senkowski; Ronaldfuller; E.w. Jones; J. Stinson; Richard Foster,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1392 07/05/96
U.S. v. Sisti 101 F.3d 1392 07/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.national Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Acme Bus Corp., Brookset Bus Corp., Baumann & Sons Buses,inc., Alert Coach Lines, Inc., a Single Employer,respondents 101 F.3d 1392 07/15/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.sheldon Golub and Golda Golub,plaintiffs-counter-defendants-appellants, v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company,defendant-counter-claimant-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.odell Johnson, Petitioner-appellant, v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1392 07/01/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.rachman Bag Company, a Partnership Composed of Plains Bagand Bagging Co., Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.albert Tulloch, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Walter R. Kelly, Superintendent; M. Cunningham, Correctionsgt., Defendants,thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Corrections Commissioner; Josephkihl, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Rodolpho Orellana-osorio, Also Known As Rudy, Also Known Asrodolfo Orellana-osorio, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.kenny A. Carter, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles Artuz, Superintendent, Dept. of Corrections, Newyork State, Bliden, Supt. Detp. of Corrections, New Yorkstate, Schneider, Capt., Miller, Sgt., Skie, Sgt., Allworking for the Dept. of Corrections, New York Stategreenhaven Corr. Facil., Sgt. Patterson, D.o.c., et al., Newyork State, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Raymond J. Whalen, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.evelyn Deckon and Michael Deckon, Individually and on Behalfof Sam Deckon, Michael Deckon, and Anna Deckon,infants, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Matthew Chidebere, Individually and As Caseworker, Childwelfare Administration; Gilda Rivas and Patricia Rivers,individually and As Supervisors, Child Welfareadministration; Barbara Sabol, Individually and Ascommissioner of Social Services of the City of New York;robert L. Little, Individually and As Deputy Commissioner Ofsocial Services of the City of New York; City of New York;bronx-lebanon Hospital Center; Ann Black; Marva L.hammons, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
U.S. v. Laureano 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.gabriel Stanescu; Stella Stanescu, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Aetna Life and Casualty Insurance Co., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 08/16/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. William Titus Jones, A/k/a Titus, A/k/a Ty, A/k/a Baby Boy,defendant-appellant,nancy Jones, Harry Jones, Alvin Sistrunk, Robert Cobb,sandra Vernon and Rossano Roy Cardillo, Defendants 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.the Park Avenue Bank, N.a., Plaintiff-counter-defendant,standard Chartered Bank, Counter-defendant-appellee, v. T.c. Ziraat Bankasi, New York Branch,defendant-counter-claimant-appellant,red Rock Commodities Ltd.; Ram Metals and Buildingindustries, Ltd., Third-party Defendants 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.kwok Ching Yu, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
U.S. v. Quintero 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ernie Buckman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Citicorp., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.donald E. Paydon, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.josefina Del Valle Hernandez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the New York City Law Department Corporation Counsel; Thecity of New York; Bonnie Bornstein; Allyson Piscitelli;eugene Borenstein; Edward I. Lieberman; Feliciadunn-jones, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Louis T. Hart, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
U.S. v. Giordano 101 F.3d 1393 07/29/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.phillip J. Bianco, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Department of Education; Connecticut Student Loanfoundation; Connecticut Bank & Trust Company,n.a. Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 08/16/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.lagraw Mcneill, Defendant-appellee, v. Dorothy Reeves, Elveta Reeves, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.michael Atkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. T.a. Coughlin, Iii, Commissioner of Correction; G. Bartlet,superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility;s. Von Hagen, Nurse Supervisor of Elmiracorrectional Facility, Defendants,j. A'hearn, Nurse at Elmira Correctional Facility, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.glendora, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John C. Malone, Bob Magness, Tele-communications Inc.;brendan Cloustan; Robert Thomson; Barry Marshall; Donnea. Fisher; John W. Gallivan; Kim Magness Robert F. Naify;paul J. O'brien; Brian Sullivan; Scott Brown; Marymagarelli; John Wicker; Nona-kerry Dunne; Myles Rich Andany John or Jane Doe Defendants May Claim As a Necessaryparty, and Yack Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, Inc.doing Business As Tci Cable of Westchester, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Monica Blanca Manzano-excelente and Miguel Ordonez, Alsoknown As Pingo, Also Known As Alberto Lopez, Alsoknown As Mauricia Fernandez, Defendants,luis Alberto Gutierrez-flores, Also Known As Ruben Andarturo Sanchez-hernandez, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.lenore Gordon and Robert Martin, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Ascher Katz, Individually and As Town Justice Andcommissioner/administrator of the Justice Court of the Townof Greenburgh, Paul Feiner, Individually and As Supervisorof the Town of Greenburgh, Lester Adler, Individually and Ascouncilperson of the Town of Greenburgh, Patrick Pilla,individually and As Former Councilperson of the Town Ofgreenburgh, Diana Juettner, Individually and Ascouncilperson of the Town of Greenburgh, Eddie Mae Barnes,individually and As Councilperson of the Town of Greenburgh,timmy Weinberg, As Councilperson of the Town of Greenburgh,town Board of the Town of Greenburgh, Town of Greenburgh,cecile F. Sia, Individually and As Court Clerk of Thejustice Court of the Town of Greenburgh, and John Doe, Asbailiff of the Justice Court of the Town of Greenburgh,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Francisco Gil, Sarah Gangemi, Angela Zuluaga, Wilfredofernandez, Lena Rose Reihart, John Builes, Humberto Acosta,mary Lynn Wright, Cheryl Lynn Mcgowan, Francisco Callirgos,sharon Gay Reihart, Alfred Cepeda, Sharon Gay Callirgos, Andrandall Reihart, Defendants,edwin Jiminez, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Tolulope Akinrosotu, A/k/a Tony Atkins, A/k/a Tolu Akinross,a/k/a "anthony B. Atkins," Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.robert F. Spigner, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the City of New York, Bronx County; Commissioner Brown, Newyork City Police Department; Police Officer Agron; Policeofficer Fuco; Police Officer Mcdonnell; Police Officemcnulty, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.marleny Agero, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward Mcelroy, District Director, Immigration Andnaturalization Service, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Edward Falco, Defendant,robert Carnival, A/k/a Bobby, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 09/27/97
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Dennis J. Pappas, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Christina Isaza-zapata, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.hasan Aksoy, Defendant-appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Elizabeth Anita Jacobs, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 08/14/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.leoncio Anibal Del Cid, Plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant, v. Beloit Corporation,defendant-third-party-plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee,majestic Molded Products Corp., Counter-claimant 101 F.3d 1393 07/02/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of America, Appellee, v. Reynel Alzate, A/k/a Rey and Manuel Cuevas-ramos, A/k/apeipo Soto, Defendants,gladys Loaiza Devilla, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23 101 F.3d 1393 10/20/76
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.malvina D'orange, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles L. Feely, Defendant-appellant,ralph Crudo & Crudo, P.c., Defendants 101 F.3d 1393 08/08/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.annette Wilson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security,department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1393 07/25/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.morse/diesel, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, Cross-appellant, v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland,defendant-third-party-plaintiff-cross-appellees. v. T. Frederick Jackson, Inc., Third-party Defendant-appellant,cross-appellee 101 F.3d 1394 08/22/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.red Rock Commodities, Ltd. and Red Rock Holdings Ltd.,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Abn-amro Bank, N.a., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1394 08/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.emon Dawkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John F. Hudcas, As Commissioner of Labor for Divisions Ofemployment and Unemployment, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1394 08/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.vorna Mcbean, Also Known As John, Defendant-appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee 101 F.3d 1394 08/21/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jason Gray, Petitioner-appellant, v. Larry Meachum, Commissioner, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1394 08/23/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.carlos Lozada, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sargeant Jerry P. Maggy; Investigator Thomas W. Kirwin;lieutenant Robert Defayette; Eugene S. Lefevre,superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility; Jamescurran, Deputy Superintendent; John Bourdon, Family Reunioncoordinator; Earl B. Moore, Assistant Commissioner;patrick J. Mcgann, First Deputy Superintendent; Thomas A.coughlin; Robert P. Sweeney; Thomas Mansfield, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1394 08/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.gustavo v. Roa, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1394 08/30/96
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.betty-louise Felton, Charlotte Green, Barbara Hruska, Meryla. Schwartz, Robert H. Side and Allen H. Zelon,plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants, v. Secretary, United States Department of Education, Defendant-appellee,chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York Andboard of Education of the City School District Ofthe City of New York,defendants-appellants-cross-appellees,rachel Agostini, Maria Cosarca, Digna Duran, Ivetteencarnacion, Maria L. Fernandez, Dolly Cutrera Then, Josephm. Then, Margaret Figueroa, Michele Gallo, Marie Sejour,joan Jackson, Cheryl Malcousu, Tonya Stevens and Rosemarievasquez, Defendants-intervenors-appellants-cross-appellees 101 F.3d 1394 08/30/96
Davis County Solid Waste Management and Energy Recoveryspecial Service District, a Utah Politicalsubdivision, Petitioners, v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent 101 F.3d 1395 12/06/96
David J. O'brien, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Norman E. Alexander; Stuart Z. Krinsly; Gerald S.gutterman; John J. Quicke; Ellen T. Harmon; Schulte Roth& Zabel; David Brodsky; Chaye Zuckerman Shapot; Sequacorporation; Sequa Capital Corporation; John Does 1-5,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1479 12/12/96
New Rock Asset Partners, L.p. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.; Daml Realty Corp;alexander Dilorenzo, Iii; Estates of Sol Goldman;state of New Jersey.preferred Entity Advancements, Inc., and Daml Realty Corp.,appellants 101 F.3d 1492 12/10/96
Charles Edward Hunter, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee.henry C. Bailey, Petitioner-appellant, v. John E. Nagle, Warden, Jeff Sessions, Attorney General Forthe State of Alabama, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1565 12/10/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Scott Nale, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1000 12/03/96
Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital, Plaintiff-appellant, v. American National Red Cross, D/b/a American Red Cross Southcarolina Blood Services Region, Defendant-appellee,andaetna Insurance Company of America; Alberta Shaw; Derrickwagner, Individually and As Parents and Naturalguardians of Eric Shaw, a Minor Underthe Age of Eighteen (18)years, Defendants 101 F.3d 1005 12/03/96
Charita D. Chalmers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Tulon Company of Richmond, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1012 12/04/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles William Mchan, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles William Mchan, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1027 12/04/96
Henry Lee Lucas, Petitioner-appellant, v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminaljustice, Institutional Division, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1045 12/05/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Billie Mac Jobe, Stephen Taylor, Philip Mark Sutton, Stanleypruet Jobe, and Fernando Novoa, Defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 1046 12/05/96
Teamsters Local Union 413, et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Driver's, Inc., Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1107 12/03/96
L.p. Cavett Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Department of Labor, et al., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1111 12/03/96
Suzanne Montgomery and Charles G. Montgomery, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Harold L. Carr, in His Official Capacity As President Andchief Executive Officer of the Great Oaks Institute Oftechnology and Career Development; Board of Education,great Oaks Institute of Technology and Career Development,defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1117 12/04/96
Cissell Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-appellee, v. United States Department of Labor, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1132 12/04/96
Prod.liab.rep. (cch) P 14,812jackie Tipton, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michelin Tire Company, Defendant-appellant,kelsey-hayes Company, Defendant 101 F.3d 1145 12/05/96
Chad Timothy Dickerson and Deon Denay Dickerson, a Minor, Byher Mother and Legal Guardian, Sharon Dalestephens, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Cory D. Mcclellan and Charles L. Stevens, Individually Andin Their Official Capacities As Police Officers for Themetropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County,tennessee, Defendants-appellants,metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County,tennessee, Defendant 101 F.3d 1151 12/09/96
James Devin, Petitioner-appellant, v. George E. Detella, Warden,1 Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1206 12/04/96
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Connell Steve Hardy, Defendant-appellant 101 F.3d 1210 12/04/96
Vassil Krastev, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent 101 F.3d 1213 12/04/96
James R. Swofford, Petitioner-appellant, v. George E. Detella, Warden, Respondent-appellee 101 F.3d 1218 02/03/97
Brian Overbeek, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles Heimbecker, Richard Hellenbrand, and Generalcasualty Company of Wisconsin, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1225 12/09/96
Anthony Dixon, Petitioner, v. James A. Chrans, et al., Respondents 101 F.3d 1228 12/09/96
John Kenneth Lockwood and Penny Lockwood, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Bowman Construction Company, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1231 12/09/96
Julian Toney and Anita L. Toney, Petitioners, v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of the United States Department Ofagriculture, Respondent 101 F.3d 1236 02/05/97
Concepts & Designs, Inc., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent.concepts & Designs, Inc., Respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner 101 F.3d 1243 12/03/96
Robert M. Nordgren, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delawarecorporation, Defendant--appellant 101 F.3d 1246 01/16/97
United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Elmer Peter Black Cloud, A/k/a Woody Black Cloud,defendant--appellant 101 F.3d 1258 12/02/96
Maxine Kescoli, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bruce Babbitt, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation Andenforcement, and the Office of Hearings Andappeals, Defendants-appellees,andpeabody Western Coal Company, Intervenor-appellee 101 F.3d 1304 11/22/96
Jerico Stone, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Writer's Guild of America West, Inc., a Californiacorporation; Frank Pierson; Del Reisman, Does 1through 20, Inclusive, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1312 11/25/96
Russell Hairston; Frank Garcia; Jaime Weindl; Jovanmccoy; Kyle Roberts; Scoreboard, Inc., a Washingtoncorporation; Team Spirit, Inc., a Washington Corporation;graham S. Anderson, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Pacific 10 Conference, an Unincorporated Association;national Collegiate Athletic Association, Anunincorporated Association, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1315 12/19/96
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8714, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 14,425in Re Terry M. Turner, Petitioner 101 F.3d 1323 01/21/97
Arlene M. Brown, M.d.; Family Practice Associates, P.c.,plaintiffs-appellees, v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services; Valerie Miller; Vickiewilliams, D.o., Defendants-appellants,andsierra Blanca Medical Associates, P.a.; Gary Jackson, D.o.,defendants.arlene M. Brown, M.d., Family Practice Associates, P.c.,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Valerie Miller, Sierrablanca Medical Associates, P.a., Vickie Williams,d.o., Gary Jackson, D.o., Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1324 11/29/96
Jason Aaron Boling, Individually and on Behalf of Otherssimilarly Situated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Roy Romer, Governor of the State of Colorado; Aristedeszavaras, Executive Director of Doc; J. Frank Rice, Wardenof Doc Diagnostic Unit; Carl W. Whiteside, Director Ofcolorado Bureau of Investigation; John or Jane Doe (1),clinical Supervisor Medical Services Drdc; Jane Doe (2),clinical Services Staff Member, Drdc; Jane Doe (3),clinical Services Staff Member, Drdc; John Doe (4),correctional Officer, Drdc, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1336 01/17/97
Mfp Fire Protection, Inc., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent.road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669, U.a., Afl-cio 101 F.3d 1341 12/03/96
Dorothy Monica David, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City and County of Denver; Wellington Webb, Mayor of Thecity and County of Denver; James Collier, Chief of Police,city and County of Denver; Beth Mccann, Manager of Safety,city and County of Denver; Stanley Baniszewski; John R.johnson; William Honer; James Leo; Clayton Kellycarpenter, Defendants-appellees 101 F.3d 1344 03/31/97
Randall A. Terry, et al., Appellants, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States Ofamerica, et al., Appellees 101 F.3d 1412 12/10/96
National Treasury Employees Union, et al., Appellants v. United States of America, Appellee 101 F.3d 1423 12/13/96
Appalachian Power Company, Petitioner v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.town of Richlands, Virginia, et al., Intervenors 101 F.3d 1432 12/17/96
Rock-tenn Company, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent,teamsters Local 728, Intervenor 101 F.3d 1441 12/17/96
Sargent D. Nichols, Individually and As He is Trustee Ofandover Northway Realty Trust, et al., Plaintiffs,appellants, v. the Cadle Co., Defendant, Appellee 101 F.3d 1448 12/19/96
Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-appellee, v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. and Robert E. Brennan,defendants-appellants 101 F.3d 1450 12/10/96
Opportunity Homes, Inc., Petitioner/cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-petitioner 101 F.3d 1515 12/09/96
Patrick Rosenstiel; Christopher Longley, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Carolyn Rodriguez, in Her Capacity As Chair of the Ethicalpractices Board, or Her Successor, Defendant-appellee 101 F.3d 1544 12/11/96