Daniel Bradley, Reginald Bridgeman, William John Brabitz,james F.x. Crawford, William Clay, Henry Wolfenand Washington Plate Printers Union,plaintiffs-appellants, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee, 1 F.3d 1252 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore NIES, Chief Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs-appellants in these six consolidated cases are journeymen blade printers currently or formerly employed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, an agency of the Department of the Treasury. They brought these actions in the Claims Court1 to recover increased rates of pay and backpay retroactive to April 1, 1983. Their claims are based upon the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 5349(a) and Treasury Personnel Manual, ch. 532, subch. 2, p 2-2d (1969) (superseded Jan. 23, 1984); Treasury Personnel Management Manual, ch. 532, subch. IV, p 3b (1984).
The Claims Court held that the plaintiffs-appellants are not entitled to recover. Bradley v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 699 (1992). We affirm the decision of the Claims Court on the basis of the comprehensive and well-considered opinion of the trial judge.
As of October 29, 1992, the "United States Court of Federal Claims." Federal Courts Administration Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-572, Sec. 902(a), 106 Stat. 4506, 4516 (1992)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
