United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. William P. Brigmon, Defendant-appellant, 1 F.3d 1242 (6th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 1 F.3d 1242 (6th Cir. 1993) July 12, 1993

Before KENNEDY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.


Defendant, William P. Brigmon, appeals the order of the district court denying his motion to suppress evidence. The issue raised by the motion was preserved for appeal in the course of defendant's having entered a plea of guilty.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in denying the motion.

As the reasons why the motion should have been denied have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose.

Accordingly, we adopt the reasoning set out by the district court in its memorandum opinion and order filed July 17, 1992, and affirm defendant's conviction and sentence.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.