Roman Richardson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Frank Williams, Solicitor; Joseph J. Watson,individually, and in His Official Capacity As Solicitor Ofthe Thirteenth Judicial Circuit; Archibald Black,individually, and in His Official Capacity As Assistantsolicitor of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit,defendants-appellees, 1 F.3d 1234 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-2725-7-20AG)
Roman Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Merrill Sauvain, Greenville, South Carolina; Edwin Pruitt Martin, Jr., W. Howard
Boyd, Jr., Gibbes & Clarkson, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Roman Richardson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Williams, No. CA-91-2725-7-20AG (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.