Arthur H. Keels, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of South Carolina; William T. Howell, Honorable;george T. Gregory, Chief Justice; David W. Harwell,associate Justice; A. Lee Chandler, Associate Justice;ernest A. Finney, Jr., Associate Justice; Jean Toal,associate Justice; John E. Waites; Michael S. Church;funderburk & Derrick, Attorneys; James W. Alford, Attorney,defendants-appellees, 1 F.3d 1233 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-1570-3-17-B)
Arthur H. Keels, Appellant Pro Se.
Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Michael Stephen Church, Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; James Warner Alford, R. Lewis Johnson, Barnes, Alford, Stork & Johnson, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Arthur H. Keels appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Keels v. South Carolina, No. CA-91-1570-3-17-B (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.