United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert Young Springborn, Defendant-appellant, 996 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Robert Young Springborn appeals his 87-month sentence following conviction upon entry of a guilty plea to two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Springborn's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Counsel correctly notes that a sentence imposed within the properly calculated United States Sentencing Guidelines range is not appealable. See United States v. Young, 988 F.2d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 1993). Furthermore, the district court exercised its discretion when determining where to sentence Springborn within the sentencing range, noting that Springborn had received a break when he was allowed to plea bargain out of two additional bank robbery counts and that he had severely traumatized a bank teller during one of the robberies. See United States v. Cervantes-Valenzuela, 931 F.2d 27, 29 (9th Cir. 1991).
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.
The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.