United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Frank Bagguley, Defendant-appellant, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
David Frank Bagguley, Appellant Pro Se.
Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, for Appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
David Frank Bagguley appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his motion for correction of his sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim P. 35 and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Bagguley, No. CR-85-64-C (W.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Bagguley's motion to appoint counsel on appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
