Robert Rudolph Pruitt, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Leroy Russell; Raine Locke Bell; Joseph Canipe, Captain,gaston County Sheriff's Department; David C.childers, Defendants-appellees, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CA-91-15-P)
Robert Rudolph Pruitt, Appellant Pro Se.
Frank Bayard Aycock, III, Charlotte, North Carolina; Raine Locke Bell, Gastonia, North Carolina; David C. Childers, Mt. Holly, North Carolina, for Appellees.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Robert Rudolph Pruitt appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and denying reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pruitt v. Russell, No. CA-91-15-P (W.D.N.C. June 21, 1991, Oct. 14 & Nov. 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
