In Re the Woodson Company, Debtor.michael E. Woodson, Appellant, v. William B. Grover; John W. Zellerbach; the Woodson Co."opt-out" Investors, Appellees, 995 F.2d 235 (9th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 995 F.2d 235 (9th Cir. 1993) Submitted May 12, 1993. *Decided May 27, 1993

Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Michael E. Woodson appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP's) order denying his motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction of an appeal from a bankruptcy court order is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 158. Allen v. Old Nat'l Bank (In re Allen), 896 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir. 1990) (per curiam). Under section 158(b), the BAP has discretion to grant leave to appeal from interlocutory orders. Id. We, however, have no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the judgment of the BAP if the order of the bankruptcy court is interlocutory. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(d); Ryther v. Lumber Products, Inc. (In re Ryther), 799 F.2d 1412, 1414 (9th Cir. 1986).

Here, the BAP denied leave to appeal from an interlocutory bankruptcy court order. We therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See id.

DISMISSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.