United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Miguel Vasquez Navarro, Defendant-appellant, 995 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1993)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 995 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1993) Submitted May 12, 1993. *Decided May 27, 1993

Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Miguel Vasquez Navarro appeals his conviction and 124-month sentence after a jury trial for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) (1), 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), Navarro's counsel filed a brief stating that he found no arguable issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw GRANTED and the district court judgment is AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.