Michael C. Meeks, Petitioner-appellant, v. James Rowland, Director, Respondent-appellee, 995 F.2d 232 (9th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 995 F.2d 232 (9th Cir. 1993) Submitted May 3, 1993. *Decided June 3, 1993

Before KOZINSKI, SUHRHEINRICH**  and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER*** 

The order of the district court denying Michael C. Meeks's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is affirmed for the reasons stated in its order entered May 30, 1990, accepting and adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated May 11, 1990.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

The Honorable Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation

 ***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by the 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.