Ludie Marsh, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Jim John, Dennis Lapso, Noble Cylar, Patrick Quinn, Androbert Brooks, Defendants-appellees, 993 F.2d 1547 (6th Cir. 1993)

Plaintiff, Ludie Marsh, appeals from an order of the district court which denied his motion for reconsideration of a previous order of that court which dismissed his claims as being barred by federal and state statutes of limitation.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in denying the motion for reconsideration.

As the reasons why judgment should have been entered for defendants have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order dated March 16, 1992.