John C. Pappas, A/k/a Connie's Carry Out, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Alexandria; Abramson Brothers, D/b/a Abramsonproperties; Dominion Lands, Incorporated; H.boyd Robinson, et Tu, Defendants-appellees,andjohn Thomas, D/b/a Snappy Snack; Frank's Catering,incorporated; John Doe, Individually (1 Through 9)defendants.john C. Pappas, A/k/a Connie's Carry Out, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Alexandria; Abramson Brothers, D/b/a Abramsonproperties; Dominion Lands, Incorporated; H.boyd Robinson, et Tu, Defendants-appellees,andjohn Thomas, D/b/a Snappy Snack; Frank's Catering,incorporated; John Doe, Individually (1 Through 9)defendants, 993 F.2d 1538 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 993 F.2d 1538 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: May 3, 1993May 18, 1993

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-1467-A)

John C. Pappas, Appellant Pro Se.

Ignacio Britto Pessoa, City Attorney's Office, Alexandria, Virginia; Anne M. Richard, Hazel & Thomas, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia; Jeffrey Allan Vogelman, Thomas, Ballenger, Vogelman & Turner, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D. Va.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

OPINION

Before RUSSELL and HALL,*  Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

John C. Pappas, doing business as Connie's Carry Out, appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment in favor of the city of Alexandria, Virginia, dismissing the remainder of his civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1961-68 (1988 & West Supp. 1992), complaint against other Defendants, and denying a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. An Appellee has filed a certified copy of Appellant's death certificate with this Court which shows John C. Pappas died during the pendency of this appeal. Therefore, we vacate the district court's order and remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40 (1950). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED


 *

Judge Hall did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.