Gwendolyn L. Grooms, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mobay Chemical Corporation, Defendant-appellee,androbert Hoguet, Defendant, 993 F.2d 1537 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-88-2237-2-18)
Gwendolyn L. Grooms, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Lucinda Jenkins Haley, Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, South Carolina; John Jay Myers, Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
OPINION
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn L. Grooms appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Defendant and denying her motion for reconsideration in her civil action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West 1985 & Supp. 1992), and various state law claims. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Grooms v. Mobay Chemical Corp., No. CA-88-2237-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 19 and Dec. 10, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Grooms's motion for appointment of counsel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
