Edward Lonnie Mccarroll, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles E. Hill, Superintendent; Lee Bounds, Secretary Ofprisons; John Smith, Chaplin of Odom; Mrs.caldwell, Bragg St. Superintendent,defendants-appellees, 993 F.2d 1537 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-92-257-BR)
Edward Lonnie McCarroll, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Edward Lonnie McCarroll filed suit under 42 U.S.C.s 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice* when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Although the district court did not so state, we note that dismissal for failing to pay a filing fee is without prejudice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
