Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.james M. Mooney, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. United States Department of Defense, Etc., Defendant, Appellee, 993 F.2d 1530 (1st Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseJames M. Mooney on brief pro se.
Peter E. Papps, Acting United States Attorney, and Gretchen Leah Witt, Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition, for appellee.
Before Torruella, Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
We have reviewed the record and the parties' submissions and are persuaded that the district court properly dismissed the instant civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Moreover, where appellant's complaint was not timely filed, transfer to the Federal Circuit was not in the interests of justice under 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Appellant's multiple objections to our orders denying his motions for oral argument and appellant's motion for authentication are denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
