United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Henry D. Jones, Defendant-appellant, 991 F.2d 792 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-603)
Henry D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Henry D. Jones appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Jones, No. CA-92-603 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Jones raised an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on the failure of counsel to advise him of the alleged grand jury infirmity, the claim is without merit. Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
