Equitable Resources Exploration, a Division of Equitableresources Energy Company, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent.national Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Equitable Resources Exploration, a Division of Equitableresources Energy Company, Respondent, 989 F.2d 492 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 989 F.2d 492 (4th Cir. 1993) Argued: February 2, 1993Decided: March 29, 1993

On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Henry Jared Wallace, Jr., REED, SMITH, SHAW & MCCLAY, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner.

Joseph Anthony Oertel, Senior Litigation Attorney, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Lauren Klett Kroeger, REED, SMITH, SHAW & MCCLAY, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner.

Jerry M. Hunter, General Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy General Counsel, Nicholas E. Karatinos, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

N.L.R.B.

ENFORCED.

Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PAYNE, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

The question presented is whether substantial evidence supports the National Labor Relations Board's determination that appellant Equitable Resources Exploration ("EREX") committed a number of unfair labor practices under §§ 8(a) (1), 8(a) (3), and 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, codified at 29 U.S.C.ss 151 et seq. We have carefully reviewed the issues, studied the briefs and the record, and heard oral argument. We think that substantial evidence does support the NLRB's ruling. Accordingly, the petition for review is denied and the order of the National Labor Relations Board is

ENFORCED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.