In Re Charles D. Roselin, 983 F.2d 1085 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore ARCHER, Circuit Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks moves to dismiss Charles D. Roselin's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Roselin opposes.
On November 20, 1990, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences affirmed the examiner's final rejection of Roselin's patent application relating to a stereo speaker system. Roselin did not appeal. On January 15, 1991, Roselin filed a notice of continuation. On February 4, 1992, the examiner entered a final rejection of the new claims. Roselin did not appeal the examiner's rejection to the Board. Instead, on July 20, 1992, Roselin filed a notice of appeal seeking review of both the Board's November 20, 1990 decision and the examiner's rejection of the new claims.
Roselin was entitled to appeal the Board's initial November 20, 1990 decision to this court. However, under 37 C.F.R. § 1.304(a), " [t]he time for filing the notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ... is two months from the date of the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences." Thus, Roselin's appeal filed nearly two years after the Board's final decision is untimely.
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 141, " [a]n applicant dissatisfied with the decision in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under section 134 of this title may appeal the decision to the United States Court of Appeals." Thus, Roselin may not appeal the examiner's decision; he may only appeal a final Board decision.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The Commissioner's motion to dismiss is granted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
