Warren Reginald Stevenson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Smith, Acting Warden; Richard A. Lanham, Actingcommissioner of Correction, Defendants-appellees.william A. Niewiadomski, Plaintiff-appellant,and Bernard L. Ward, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Bernard Smith, Acting Warden, Defendant-appellee.richard Brees, Plaintiff-appellant,and Lynn Hewitt; Larry Biggs; James Dawson; David Crouch;david Dent; Anthony B. Hawkins; Edgardlindamood; Kimberly Ruffner; Philliptaylor; Robert White; Jamesnewkirk, Plaintiffs, v. Bernard Smith, Acting Warden, Defendant-appellee, 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-91-1405-B, CA-91-1110-B, CA-91-983-B)
Warren Reginald Stevenson, William A. Niewiadomski, Richard Brees, Appellants Pro Se.
D. Md.
Affirmed.
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Warren Reginald Stevenson, William A. Niewiadomski, and Richard Brees appeal from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stevenson v. Smith, No. CA-91-1405-B (D. Md. Sept. 3, 1992); Niewiadomski v. Smith, No. CA-91-1110-B (D. Md. Sept. 3, 1992); Brees v. Smith, No. CA-91-983-B (D. Md. Sept. 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.