Manuel H. Venable, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray; Dave Garraghty, Defendants-appellees.manuel H. Venable, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Park of Correction, Defendant-appellee.manuel H. Venable, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Park of Correction, Defendant-appellee, 981 F.2d 1252 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Manuel H. Venable, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Manuel H. Venable appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on three complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Venable v. Murray, No. CA-92-1089-AM (E.D. Va. July 27, 1992); Venable v. Park of Correction, No. CA-92-1088AM (E.D. Va. July 27, 1992); Venable v. Park of Correction, No. CA-92-1179 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 92-6858
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
