In Re: George H. Van Wagner, Iii, Petitioner, 979 F.2d 849 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseOn Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
George H. Van Wagner, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
PETITION DENIED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
George Van Wagner petitions this Court for a Writ of Mandamus, alleging a delay by the district court in acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. The district court recently dismissed Van Wagner's § 2255 motion. As a result, this mandamus petition is moot. Accordingly, we deny Van Wagner's petition for Writ of Mandamus and grant in forma pauperis status. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
