Adrian Gerard Brockington, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Defendant-appellee, 979 F.2d 847 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, Magistrate Judge. (CA-88-3866-WN)
Adrian Gerard Brockington, Appellant Pro Se.
David George Karro, United States Postal Service, Washington, D.C.; Norma Brown Hutcheson, Office of Field Legal Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Adrian Gerard Brockington appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to amend or alter the magistrate judge's* earlier judgment denying relief in a Title VII action. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Brockington's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Brockington v. Frank, No. CA-88-3866-WN (D. Md. Sept. 27, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
