Clifton B. Tomlin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Zapata Haynie Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 978 F.2d 1256 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-115-3)
Clifton B. Tomlin, Appellant Pro Se.
Albert Davis Bugg, Jr., Rumsey, Breeden, Hubbard, Bugg & Terry, Irvington, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
Affirmed.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Clifton Tomlin appeals from the district court's order denying Tomlin's motion for relief under Rule 60(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tomlin v. Zapata, No. CA-91-115-3 (E.D. Va. May 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
