Flossie W. Nzongola, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Quality Transmission; Gary Doe, Owner, Qualitytransmission; State of South Carolina, Department Ofconsumer Affairs, Division of Consumer Advocacy; Greenvillecounty, Department of Consumer Affairs; Commission Onconsumer Affairs; Human Relations Commission; Julia Adams;the District of Columbia, Public Works Department, Parkingenforcement Division, Defendants-appellees, 978 F.2d 1255 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1703-3-8AJ)
Flossie W. Nzongola, Appellant Pro Se.
D.S.C.
Affirmed.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Flossie W. Nzongola appeals from the district court's order dismissing her civil action without prejudice. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nzongola v. Quality Transmission, No. CA-92-1703-3-8AJ (D.S.C. July 23, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
