Gary Eugene Kukes, Petitioner-appellant, v. Butte County Child Protective Services, Respondent-appellee, 977 F.2d 589 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 977 F.2d 589 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. *Decided Oct. 2, 1992

MEMORANDUM** 

Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


Kukes, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from an order of the district court dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court held that it did not have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.

On December 22, 1986, Kukes was convicted of murdering his wife. The Butte County Child Protective Services, a county agency, took custody of Kukes's two minor daughters following his arrest on March 19, 1986. In August 1986, the state juvenile court placed Kukes's children in foster care. On appeal, Kukes contends that his children are being wrongfully detained in violation of his and his daughters' constitutional rights. We review the district court's decision to deny Kukes's petition for habeas corpus de novo. Adams v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835, 843 (9th Cir. 1992) (en banc).

Because section 2254(a) does not confer jurisdiction on federal courts to hear collateral challenges to state-court judgments involuntarily terminating parental rights, we hold that the district court did not err. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Sers., 458 U.S. 502, 516 (1982).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.