Raymond A. Schmoll, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Defendants,andraytech Corporation, Defendant-appellant.raymond A. Schmoll, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Defendants,andraytech Corporation, Defendant-appellant, 977 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseWilliam N. Reed, H. Mitchell Cowan, J. Randall Patterson, Watkins Ludlam & Stennis, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant.
Henry Kantor, Jeffrey S. Mutnick, Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Owen M. Panner, Chief Judge.
Before: BEEZER, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Under Oregon law, creditors have priority over shareholders in all of the future earnings of an insolvent corporation. We have reviewed the record in No. 89-35168 and we affirm the district court's judgment on the grounds stated in its opinion. Schmoll v. ACandS, Inc., 703 F. Supp. 868 (D. Or. 1988).
We dismiss Raytech's appeal of an interlocutory order in No. 89-35101.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
