Timothy Owens, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Daniel Reynolds, Warden; Rita Andrews, Deputy Warden Ofsecurity, Osp; Daniel Nace, Security Major, Osp; Captainsteve Leeper; C.o. Ii Charles Branson; Sergeant Jimmyquinton; C.o. Ii Larry Watson; C.o. I Joe Ardese; C.o. Ijames Williams; C.o. I Mark Sherwood; C.o. I Jamesrichards; Sergeant Billy Cokey; C.o. I Mark Jennings;c.o. I Brian Holden; C.o. I Lonnie Humpheries; C.o. Irobert Dibbles; C.o. I Donald Petty; C.o. I Whitlock;sergeant James Sockey; C.o. I Angie Sockey; C.o. I J.johnson; C.o. I Jeff Palmer; C.o. I Charlie Williamson;c.o. I Bill Masterson; C.o. I Nelms; C.o. I Robert Ortgh;c.o. I Marion Bess; Unknown Correctional Officers; C.o. Ij. Nowlin; C.o. Timothy Turman; C.o. I Roy Anderson; C.o.i Pete Underwood; Sergeant Mike Sizemore, Defendants-appellees, 976 F.2d 740 (10th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore JOHN P. MOORE, TACHA and BRORBY Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff-Appellant Timothy Owens appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have construed the pleadings liberally and reviewed the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff-appellant, and agree with the district court's findings. We therefore AFFIRM for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court's order dated May 20, 1992. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
