Larry Trudo; Nick Lucero, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. County of Pueblo; Larry Buckallew; Dan Tihonovich; 8unknown Deputy Sheriffs; County of Pueblo Andcounty Deputy Sheriffs, Defendants,andbrian Mihelich; Kent Ervin; Kenneth Kaufman; Charlesspinuzzi; Carlotta Gonzales; Florence Chacon;steven Bryant, Defendants-appellants, 974 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 974 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir. 1992) Aug. 11, 1992

Before McKAY, LOGAN and JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER* 

PER CURIAM.


Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed. R. App. P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal has been settled and is hereby dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its order of summary judgment of June 18, 1991, and to dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir. 1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 948 (10th Cir. 1987).

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

 *

This judgment and order has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.