United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bahauddin Khan Khattak, A/k/a Bahoudi, Defendant-appellant, 972 F.2d 343 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBahauddin Khan Khattak, Appellant Pro Se.
Christine Fay Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Bahauddin Khan Khattak appeals from the district court's refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Khattak, Nos. CR-89-88-A, CA-91-1205-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 1991). We deny appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
