Claude Richard Huggins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. North Carolina Parole Commission, Defendant-appellee, 972 F.2d 340 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-92-91-BR)
Claude Richard Huggins, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Claude Richard Huggins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Huggins v. North Carolina Parole Comm'n, No. CA-92-91-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 1992).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
In addition to the reasoning of the district court, we note that a potential parolee has no constitutional right of access to his prison files. Ross v. Woodard, 683 F.2d 846 (4th Cir. 1982)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
