Ronald M. O'brien, Petitioner, v. Department of the Air Force, Respondent, 972 F.2d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 972 F.2d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 1992) June 5, 1992

Before RICH, PAULINE NEWMAN and MICHEL, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

DECISION

PER CURIAM.


Ronald M. O'Brien petitions for review of the November 20, 1991 award of the arbitrator in FMCS File No. 91-24396 (Grievance No. 91-129), denying O'Brien's grievance. We affirm.

DISCUSSION

The arbitrator sustained the agency's removal of O'Brien for assaulting a supervisor, finding that the agency established the fact of the assault by a preponderance of credible evidence. O'Brien does not allege any legal error, but contends that the arbitrator "erred in analyzing the testimony of the witnesses." As the allegations of his informal brief make clear, O'Brien's petition is primarily a challenge to the arbitrator's credibility determinations. Such determinations of a presiding official are "virtually unreviewable" by this court. Hambsch v. Department of the Treasury, 796 F.2d 430, 436 (Fed. Cir. 1986). We may not overturn the arbitrator's award, sustaining the agency's removal of O'Brien, unless we find it to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence. See 5 USC 7703(c); 5 USC 7121(f) (section 7703 applies to arbitrator's award as if decided by Merit Systems Protection Board). We see no such error in this case.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.