Jerald C. Cunningham, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Maddox, et al., Defendants-appellees, 972 F.2d 1338 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 972 F.2d 1338 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted July 27, 1992. *Decided Aug. 3, 1992

Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Jerald C. Cunningham appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint prior to service and with prejudice. The court concluded that Cunningham's claims were time-barred. We have carefully reviewed the record. We affirm the court's judgment for the reasons stated in its memorandum decision and order.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4, the panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this Circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.