Studio 1712, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Etna Products Co., Inc., a New York Corporation; Harrietcarter Gifts, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation;hanover House Industries, Inc., Apennsylvania Corporation,defendants-appellants, 968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992) July 10, 1992

Before LOGAN, MOORE and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed. R. App. P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal has been settled and is hereby dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate the preliminary injunction entered on November 6, 1991, reported at 777 F. Supp. 844 (D. Colo. 1991), and the order modifying the preliminary injunction entered on January 13, 1992. The district court is further directed to dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S. Ct. 104, 106-107, 95 L. Ed. 36 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir. 1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 948 (10th Cir. 1987).

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.