Roosevelt Wiggins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James G. Martin; Joseph L. Anderson; Robert C. Lewis;danny C. Stewart; Randy Lee; Clarence E. King;mike Pierce; Bill Shorts, Defendants-appellees, 963 F.2d 368 (4th Cir. 1992)

Roosevelt Wiggins appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion to reconsider its dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that there was no abuse of discretion either in denying Plaintiff's postjudgment motion or in the court's dismissal of the action pursuant to § 1915(d) (1988). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wiggins v. Martin, No. CA-91-682CRT-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6 and Dec. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED